News24

MPs hear of pit toilet problems

2012-09-04 18:56

Cape Town - Building pit toilets in rural areas is an expensive and problem-plagued business, MPs heard on Tuesday.

According to figures tabled before Parliament's public services select committee, it has cost on average about R7 500 to build each of more than 35 000 so-called ventilated pit latrines (VIPs) in rural municipalities the past two financial years.

The total spent directly on building these VIPs during 2010/11 and 2011/12 was R267m.

Briefing members, human settlements chief sanitation director Phillip Chauke said the countrywide sanitation backlog, in April last year, was just over 2.4 million households.

Noting that the backlog in 1994 had been more than five million households, he told members: "We have had remarkable progress."

According to a document tabled at the briefing - essentially a progress report on the provision of sanitation in terms of government's four-year, R1.2bn Rural Household Infrastructure Programme (RHIP) - a total of 11 652 VIPs were installed in 2010/11.

A further 24 089 were installed last year (2011/12).

The total RHIP budget allocated over this two-year period was R331.5m, of which - according to Chauke - a total of about R267m was spent "directly" on VIPs.

Most needy


Up to 53 rural municipalities in seven provinces (not included in the programme are Gauteng and Western Cape municipalities) had benefited from the programme in the past financial year (2011/12).

Human settlements sanitation director Cyprian Mazubana told the committee that the department had selected municipalities deemed the "most needy" to be included in the programme.

The RHIP budget for the current (2012/13) financial year is R479.5m.

Chauke said the target number of rural VIP latrines to be built this year was 53 266, a figure one-and-a-half times more than the programme has achieved in total over the past two years.

The difference between a VIP and an ordinary pit latrine is the former includes a mesh-capped ventilation pipe to reduce odour and kill flies.

Chauke said that among problems facing the programme was that the two "implementing agents" appointed to build the VIPs could neither cope with the scale of the programme, nor achieve the targets set.

The two agencies are the Independent Development Trust and the Mvula Trust. Chauke said that after negotiations with them the programme was now being opened up to other contractors.

Backlog

According to the briefing document: "[The department] is currently in the process of allocating approximately 40% [of the] balance of the 2012/13 budget to tender for additional implementing agents to be added to the programme."

This amounts to about R200m of the R479.5m budget allocated for the year.

Chauke said another problems was the inability of many of the municipalities involved to remove sludge and maintain the VIPs, which have an average five-to-eight year life span before they are full and unusable.

This was adding to the sanitation backlog problem.

Further problems besetting the programme included difficulties in procuring building material, difficult ground conditions, and "excessive rainfall" in some areas, he said.

According to the national department - which assumed responsibility for sanitation from water affairs in November 2009 - there are 12.25 million "households" in South Africa spread across 68 000 "settlements".

The bulk (87%) of these settlements are in rural areas, home to about 40% of the country's 50.6 million people.

Comments
  • holden.gardnercaulfield - 2012-09-04 19:10

    Judge Nathan Erasmus: "It is unfortunate that in the scramble for limited resources, which have to address the historical imbalances and to cater for immediate needs, it has become the subject of political contest and patronage as opposed to the responsible use thereof to fulfill the State's constitutional obligations." www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2011/97.html

  • lacrimose.wolf - 2012-09-04 19:59

    R7500 for something that lasts 5-8 years? Are we addressing the right problem and are we addressing it in the right way?

      godfrey.welman - 2012-09-04 21:12

      No, but a tender here and a kick-back there, more reason not to address the right problem.

  • sheik.mohammad.378 - 2012-09-04 20:52

    I'll now look at VIP's within Government in a different light

  • christi.roestorff - 2012-09-04 21:16

    10 years ago my father and I built a septic tank with left over/scrap building material, it took some research and a long weekend to build and connect. It cost a few pockets of cement and some sweat. Now he has a flushing toilet that can cater for 15 people over a month and have had no problems at all, the water now even comes from rainwater tanks. Cost, way less than R7k! What's the fuss about?

      lacrimosewolf - 2012-09-04 22:03

      @christi.roerstoff - This article doesn't say how many people the R7500 option serves but if you have a design/plan, send it to Phillip Chauke. We read elsewhere how govt pays R30 for a loaf of bread, R500 for a broom. Maybe R7500 is also part of the madness

  • jimmy.kawa.1 - 2012-09-05 05:39

    VIP - very important pit-latrine... this can be turned into all kinds of acronyms now.

  • pages:
  • 1