Minister unaware of Nkandla report court bid

2014-06-01 13:00

Johannesburg - Newly appointed Justice Minister Michael Masutha was unaware of any legal action against the Public Protector in connection with her report on Nkandla, the City Press reported on Sunday.

"I've heard the story [of a legal challenge to the Nkandla report] but I'm not aware of litigation pending against the Public Protector on this matter," he told the newspaper.

Masutha was reported as saying he believed that if Parliament "resuscitate[d]" the matter, this setting was the suitable space in which to deal with the report.

"I think that is the appropriate forum to decide on the matter."

In the last sitting of Parliament before the elections in May, it was voted that an ad hoc parliamentary committee to deal with the report be handled by the incoming Parliament.

Last month, the previous security cluster ministers said they would seek a judicial review of the Nkandla report as they considered some of the findings and recommendations as "irrational, contradictory and... informed by material errors of law".

'Puzzling' issues

The City Press reported that no court papers had been filed by the weekend.

Masutha told the newspaper that he deemed Madonsela's report as "good... in many respects.

"There are many issues that are a bit puzzling for me that I prefer not to deal with outside parliamentary process."

Madonsela told the City Press that if a legal challenge was raised again, she would like to meet with Masutha, "to see if there is a way I could assist the security cluster ministers with an explanation that could help avoid going to court at this stage. However, if the ministers still want to go to court, I am fine with that. I am certain I will win the case," she said.

Madonsela's report found that President Jacob Zuma and his family unduly benefited from R246m in security upgrades to his private Nkandla homestead. These included a swimming pool, a cattle kraal, and an amphitheatre. She recommended, among other things, that he repay a portion of the money.

  • Freddy van Wijk - 2014-06-01 13:28


  • Bolsheviks Gauteng - 2014-06-01 13:34

    I dont know why they want to mount a legal challenge.They have never implemented one report of the Public Protector.There was a PP report finding against Tina Joemat Petterson over the Sekunjalo tender.She is back.There was a PP report against Bheki Cele.He is back.The voters vote for corruption,that is why there is no accountability

  • Nico de Jongh - 2014-06-01 14:11

    And showerhead refuses to come clean.

      Gat Vol - 2014-06-07 18:38

      Just as long as you keep paying!!!

  • Peter Webb - 2014-06-01 14:58

    How would a dimwit be aware of such a report.

  • Martin Pearce - 2014-06-01 15:17

    Deny any knowledge, thereby deny any accountability.

  • Mannie777 - 2014-06-01 15:45

    This was news days/weeks ago the minister confirming that he is not in touch with SA's current affairs?

  • Allan Whitton - 2014-06-01 16:15

    If the ANC inquiry found that money had been mis-spent why has no-one been charged since they released the report in December last year. They must know who did it as they identified that it had happened. You can't say that it happened without knowing who it was

  • Gat Vol - 2014-06-07 18:35

    How can he be "unaware" of the Nkandla court bid??? Zuma is already playing the sick card,so it will never be sorted!!!

  • pages:
  • 1