News24

Mthethwa: Key Points Act won't be scrapped

2013-11-08 17:11

Cape Town - The National Key Points Act will not be scrapped but amended, Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa said on Friday.

"It's the parts of the act which are not in line with the Constitution that are going to be repealed but the national key points as an act is here to stay," he said during a National Assembly debate on the relevance of the act.

Earlier Democratic Alliance parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko lambasted government for keeping the apartheid-era law on the statute books to hide corruption.

This included the controversial R206m upgrade to President Jacob Zuma's private Nkandla residence in KwaZulu-Natal.

The DA's submission of a private member's bill to replace the existing law was opportunistic, Mthethwa said. A review of the act was already in full swing, and an advisory committee announced in May was at an advanced stage in its work.

"The committee has come back to report that the work is ongoing. We are going at end of November to be coming up with a reviewed policy on this matter."

Threats

The policy would then go through a public participation process early next year.

Mthethwa said although the act was drafted by the apartheid regime, it remained relevant given problems in South Africa and many other countries around the world.

"Risk in the 21st century results from [a] complex mix of man-made and naturally occurring threats and hazards, including terrorist attacks, accidents, natural disasters and other emergencies.

"Within this context, our critical infrastructure and key resources may be directly exposed to the event or indirectly exposed..."

Government's stance on the act came under attack from most opposition parties in the House, who wanted it scrapped and replaced with a new law.

The parties claimed it was and would continue to be abused by members of Zuma's executive as an excuse not to answer questions on how public money was being spent.

"Perhaps it's because over time this government has come to favour secrecy over transparency. Perhaps it's because this government would rather hide the truth than hold its own to account," Mazibuko said.

‘Bill won’t be left to abuse’

She submitted a private member's bill to Parliament this week aimed at replacing the National Key Points Act.

"It is a bill that will not be left open to government abuse so that ministers can declare key points every time they wish to hide how much money they have spent on security upgrades," she said.

She was referring to the classification of reports on probes into the Nkandla upgrade.

"We cannot afford to let our government spend a cent more on cattle culverts, and helipads, and astroturfs for some when we should be spending money on creating jobs and improving education and delivering services to the millions of people who need them," Mazibuko said.

Waterkloof Air Base not a key point

Congress of the People leader Mosiuoa Lekota backed the DA's attempt to correct the apartheid-era law, citing abuse of the law in its current form.

"What we are now seeing is that legislation used by the National Party then is being used to advance corruption because now public funds are being taken to put in and give inheritance to those who happened to have occupied an office for a while," Lekota said.

He questioned why the Waterkloof Air Force Base, one of the country's prime military installations, was not a key point, while Nkandla was.

"Nothing can be more ridiculous than the fact that we are faced here with an administration who are determined to enrich itself for the limited period of time that it is in power," Lekota said.

Inkatha Freedom Party MP Velaphi Ndlovu said the act had to be either overhauled or amended.

Freedom Front Plus MP Pieter Groenewald said the party would support a revised law, but only if it contained clear criteria for declaring a key point.

"You cannot deny it that there was massive misuse of this act to protect Nkandla. What threat is there for South Africa if there's an attack... who wants to attack Nkandla?" Groenewald asked.

Comments
  • Timothy Hoatson - 2013-11-08 17:16

    Dear South Africa! The ANC has not had an easy task of transitioning us out of that evil system called apartheid into this wonderful gift the modern world has called democracy. Good has been done by the ANC, there has been economic progress, there has been social progress. But I want to ask you this question my beloved South African Family. Is it the best we could have done? Have our leaders done everything they can to bring to your children an exciting and comfortable place of learning? Have they brought your gogo a hospital that can treat her with the care she needs in her old? Have they bought our wives and children safety in the homes and on the streets? Open your eyes to see.. the wonderful progress, but look beyond at the despair that seems to outshine this progress. Could more be done with the Billions of TAX revenue that is generated in this country each year? Could there be less corruption? Could we have a brighter future together under new leadership? I believe we can! I know we can! I am voting DA. They are not perfect, they don't have all the answers, but I believe they have more answers for the current problems than our current leaders do. Make your X Count! VIVA SOUTH AFRICA!

      Armstrong Dreadnaught - 2013-11-08 18:00

      Vote DA for change. Boycott the anc. They make cattle kraals into "National Key Points"!!

  • Simon Ramapuputla - 2013-11-08 17:32

    We thank you Mr Mthethwa, DA will always win on Media platforms, however that will not translate to Action. they must stop dreaming and accpet our policies.

      Andrew Justin Loubser - 2013-11-08 18:00

      This is not your law. It is an old apartheid law. So by agreeing with it would be like voting back apartheid. The anc only want to keep this to hide their corruption behind it.

      Armstrong Dreadnaught - 2013-11-08 18:01

      Ha! effing Ha!

      Bhekinkosi Langa - 2013-11-08 19:31

      Simon stop being a habitual LIAR. Is it the Media which disqualied the employment of Fired NPA Boss,the failure of the Minister to read nd interpret clause 206 of the Constitution with regard to WC Police?

      Godfrey Welman - 2013-11-08 22:25

      @Simon..so why did your ANC fight apartheid as evil, now you agree with this evil policy. Therefore you must agree with e-tolls and Info. Bill, very clever, untill you flea SA like those from Zim.

  • Mashilo Allie Matshekga - 2013-11-08 17:52

    Someone tell me its not true, after over twenty years of false democracy, people are fighting to keep a law of corruption

  • Trudi Roos Potter - 2013-11-08 17:59

    I am not good at words, but this man justs Sounds ridiculous.

  • JamesMWood - 2013-11-08 18:18

    Amazing how the anc so hated that bad bad appartheid era, but boy do they just love whipping out those laws to protect themselves!

  • Tinabtlr - 2013-11-08 18:33

    I can think of quite a few people who would want to attack Nkandla. But only if our honorable Prez intends to rule till Kingdom come. Who knows, maybe he intends breaking the constitution soon and declare himself our one and only despot ruler for life - ala Mugabe style?

  • Tumi Moetlo - 2013-11-08 18:37

    When it suit them,they wont scrap but amendt.Your days are numbered in the cabinet.

  • Cecil Rowe - 2013-11-08 20:11

    Corruption cover ups proudly brought to you by the ...

  • Ken Amery - 2013-11-09 07:21

    GIVE HIM ANOTHER CHANCE???? HE FUDGED UP THE FIRST ONE

  • Colin Craig Broadfoot - 2013-11-09 10:43

    We have millions of National Key Points in South Africa. Kraals is one. Not Airports.

  • Khanyi Myataza - 2013-11-09 11:23

    Let me guess: one of the changes will be that Waterkloof is a flexible National Key Point, when a Gupta aircraft approaches, the NKP status gets switched OFF, customs officials are quickly assigned to receive the visitors, then it gets switched back ON. Then it'll be easy to say "comrades and compatriots, at the time of the landing, we are of the view that the NKP status switch was in OFF position and we have records to prove it".

  • pages:
  • 1