Power without proper review is dangerous - HSF

2014-08-19 18:23
The Constitutional Court (Picture: Sapa)

The Constitutional Court (Picture: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The police minister's powers to suspend the head of the Hawks are too broad and open to abuse, the Constitutional Court heard on Tuesday.

David Unterhalter, for the Helen Suzman Foundation, told the court the prescripts governing the power to suspend were vaguely defined.

"Grounds of suspension are not specified," Unterhalter said.

"An exercise of power without proper review is dangerous."

He said a process located within Parliament would guarantee a greater degree of oversight.

At the moment, the decision to suspend was located in the executive, because the minister made the decision following the concurrence of Cabinet.

Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke challenged Unterhalter, stating: "I frankly don't follow the argument at all."

Moseneke said those suspended could approach the courts beyond the legal framework already in place.

Unterhalter said the minister's powers of suspension were not specified, and a suspension made on "a ministerial whim" could disrupt the office of the Hawks, with "huge consequences".

Even if a Hawks head sought to challenge his or her suspension, it would take time, which could be advantageous if, for example, that minister was being investigated by the Hawks.

Unterhalter proposed that the minister had to show a prima facie case, even when an urgent suspension was sought, to shield the process from abuse.

Judge Johann van der Westhuizen said even if the minister was the subject of a Hawks investigation, he could carry out the suspension anyway, unlawfully, because in the end a court would again be the place of redress.

"There is a certain level of corrupt evil intent that is almost impossible to stop," Van der Westhuizen said.

‘Turf wars’

Unterhalter said the Hawks had to be able to investigate cases according to its own mandate, and not have "turf wars" with other law enforcement bodies.

"One must recognise the mandate of the directorate to pursue crimes for which it was established... particularly around corruption and organised crime," he said.

The foundation and businessman Hugh Glenister are seeking leave to appeal against a high court's refusal to declare certain provisions of the SAPS Amendment Act unconstitutional and secure the independence of the Hawks.

The case stems from 2008, when the Scorpions crime-fighting unit, which fell under the National Prosecuting Authority's jurisdiction, was dissolved and replaced by the Hawks, or Directorate of Special Operations. The Hawks are under the SAPS's jurisdiction.

Since then, Glenister and the foundation have been fighting a court battle to ensure the Hawks are separated from the SAPS, which they claim are corrupt and compromises the investigative unit's independence.

In December, Western Cape High Court Judge Siraj Desai ruled parts of the legislation governing the Hawks inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid in terms of ensuring adequate independence.

Along with the foundation, Glenister is arguing the high court ruling did not go far enough to secure the Hawks sufficient institutional and operational independence.

The State opposes the confirmation of the order of invalidity and is applying for leave to appeal against it.

The State argues that the SAPS Amendment Act creates sufficient independence for the Hawks and that the doctrine of separation of powers prevents the courts from being overly prescriptive about the legislative measures taken by the state to fight corruption.

Read more on:    concourt  |  npa  |  hawks  |  johannesburg  |  crime

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Competition regulation for a growing and inclusive economy

ADVERTORIAL: The Competition Commission of South Africa is conducting advocacy work in the South African automotive aftermarket industry and has gazetted a Draft Code of Conduct for public comment.


How to open a beer bottle without an opener

Do the right thing and never be thirsty again…


You won't want to miss...

WATCH: Man films himself going down water slide upside down as things go very wrong…
WATCH: Conor McGregor: Notorious the trailer
Best date night restaurants in South Africa
WATCH: Ryan Reynolds offers fans a free tattoo in new Deadpool 2 teaser
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.