Public Protector ruling not legally binding - Jeffery

2014-10-05 14:06
Public Protector Thuli Madonsela speaks at a conference on crime and justice in Sandton, Johannesburg. (Werner Beukes, Sapa)

Public Protector Thuli Madonsela speaks at a conference on crime and justice in Sandton, Johannesburg. (Werner Beukes, Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The decisions taken by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela are not legally binding, Deputy Justice Minister John Jeffery said.

"It all boils down to the question of whether or not the Public Protector's decisions are legally binding or enforceable? We, in government, argue that they cannot be," he said in a speech prepared for delivery at the University of KwaZulu-Natal on Saturday.

"The Public Protector is not a court of law."

The copy of his speech, received on Sunday, said that when the Constitutional Court certified the text of the Constitution, it held that the public protector was an office modelled on the institution of an Ombudsman.

"The only reason it was called a Public Protector and [not] an Ombudsman is because the term Ombudsman was considered to be gender-insensitive."

"Ombuds around the world do not make legally enforceable findings, unless their enabling legislation expressly provides them with quasi-judicial powers."

Jeffery said the powers of the public protector was limited and that the Constitution refers only to recommendations that she can make.

In March, Madonsela found that Zuma had derived undue benefit from R246m in improvements made to his Nkandla homestead in KwaZulu-Natal. She recommended that he pay back a portion of the money. Zuma did not do so, and instead waited for the outcome of another investigation by the Special Investigating Unit.

The SIU blamed the architect Minenhle Makhanya for inflating the costs of the Nkandla project, and filed a civil claim against him for R155m in the Pietermaritzburg High Court on 11 August. Makhanya has hired high profile lawyers to contest the case.

Twelve other officials from the public works department who were implicated in wrongdoing related to the upgrades were due to appear before a disciplinary hearing in Durban. The first hearing would commence on 27 October.

Parliament's ad-hoc committee on Nkandla is also dealing with the matter, albeit without the opposition who walked out.

Read more on:    public protector  |  john jeffery  |  thuli ­madonsela

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.