R2K slams government challenge of Nkandla report

2014-05-20 15:31
(Giordano Stolley, Sapa)

(Giordano Stolley, Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - The Right2Know (R2K) campaign on Tuesday condemned a decision by the security cluster of ministers to challenge Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's report on Nkandla in the high court.

"This move is the latest example of the use of state security structures to infringe on democratic processes and undermine accountability," the R2K said in a statement.

"South Africans need to take note of how easily expansive national security priorities are being distorted and can encroach on democratic principles; in the wrong hands, national security can and has been used as an excuse to stifle debate, undermine accountability, and protect the powerful from embarrassment."

The R2K wants the ministers to abandon their pending court action.

"Just as importantly, the president and his new ministers must reflect on the damage done to our democracy in the name of national security, and commit itself to a new mode of governance that is guided by the constitutional values of openness, participation and accountability."

Review of report

Last week, government announced it wanted the public protector's report titled "Secure in Comfort" to be reviewed in the high court.

The ministers claim the report and Madonsela's investigation infringed the constitutional doctrine of a separation of powers.

In her report Madonsela found President Jacob Zuma and his family unduly benefited from a R246m security upgrade to his private Nkandla homestead in KwaZulu-Natal, which included a swimming pool, a cattle kraal, and an amphitheatre.

She recommended, among other things, that he repay a portion of the money.

Zuma has said he will await the outcome of another probe by the Special Investigating Unit before responding to the matter.

The DA said it was consulting its lawyers with a view to joining the high court case as an intervening party.

The DA believed the judicial review was part of a greater plan to block the reappointment of an ad hoc committee to consider the matter.

The committee, which was set to consider Zuma's submissions on the Nkandla report, was effectively dissolved on 28 April.

A report by the committee referring the matter to the fifth Parliament was adopted, following heated arguments between ANC MPs and their opposition counterparts.

Read more on:    da  |  anc  |  right2know  |  jacob zuma  |  thuli madonsela  |  johannesburg  |  parliament 2014  |  nkandla upgrade

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.