SCA to hear why Oscar should be convicted of murder

2015-11-03 05:22
Oscar Pistorius (Alon Skuy, Times Media Group, Pool)

Oscar Pistorius (Alon Skuy, Times Media Group, Pool)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


State's argument that Pistorius murdered Steenkamp is strong - criminal law expert

2015-11-02 14:00

One does not have to be a fantastic lawyer to determine that four shots into a small toilet, knowing there is someone behind the door, is tantamount to murder says this criminal law expert.WATCH

Bloemfontein - The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) is expected to hear the State's argument on Tuesday on why former Paralympian Oscar Pistorius should be convicted of murder, and not culpable homicide. 

In October last year, High Court Judge Thokozile Masipa sentenced Pistorius to five years in jail for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp. He shot her through the locked door of the toilet in his Pretoria home on Valentine’s Day 2013, claiming he thought she was an intruder.

The double-amputee track star was sentenced to a further three years, suspended for five years, for firing a shot at Tasha’s restaurant in Johannesburg, in January 2013.

The State was granted leave to appeal his conviction on a charge of culpable homicide. 

Pistorius was released under correctional supervision last month. He was expected to serve out the rest of his sentence at the home of his uncle Arnold Pistorius in Waterkloof, Pretoria. 

The State is expected to argue that the principle of dolus eventualis (legal intention) was incorrectly applied in his trial. They would argue that the four shots he fired showed an intention to kill a person, regardless of who it was. 

Pistorius's lawyers were expected to argue that he genuinely believed he was in imminent danger when he fired his gun. 

His lawyer, Barry Roux, said in papers filed with the SCA that Pistorius could not afford a new trial, which would be too long and complex. 

He said the initial trial was subject to intense public scrutiny, which would "contaminate and confuse" the reliability and objectivity of witnesses and proceedings in a new trial.

Pistorius’s "financial ability" for a new trial was "non-existent", Roux said.

He further faced the risk of double jeopardy in that he would be charged with murder again, on the same facts, a charge of which he was acquitted.

Read more on:    reeva steenkamp  |  oscar pistorius  |  barry roux  |  bloemfontein  |  pistorius trial

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.