Study shows grants end up in right place

2012-03-06 22:06

Johannesburg - South Africa's child support grant is ending up in the right pockets, a new study has found.

It is putting money in women's hands which was used for household expenses and children, said Leila Patel, director of the Centre for Social Development in Africa at the University of Johannesburg.

She said the study, released on Tuesday, proved the grants were reaching and empowering the right people.

"Even though the amount per child is very low [R270 per month] the money, for the most part, is being spent on food."

Detractors of the social grant have accused government of paying women to have babies, and claim wide-scale abuse and fraud.

"This was not the finding of our study and which can be generalised so as to represent similar urban poor communities in other parts of the country," she said.

The three-year research project was done in Doornkop in Soweto.

A total of 343 households were surveyed to find out if the CSG improved the lives of women and children.

Patel, who led the study, said the researchers found that women were the key financial decision-makers in households receiving the grant.

Those accessing the grant also tended to be better organised than those who were not accessing the grant.

They participated in the community and other projects to improve their lives.

The researchers visited schools and clinics in the area and found that, for the most part, children were also benefiting from school feeding programmes and clinic services.

Where some grant money was lost was when recipients used it to access social services like education and health that were free for the very poor.

"Recipients don't always know what they don't have to pay for," she said.

While the community could be described as "extremely poor", 92% of parents receiving the CSG felt their children were in good health.

The majority (88%) attended school and 97% had been immunised.

Older children sometimes missed out on feeding schemes through poor organisation at their high schools.

The study found that 92%of grant beneficiaries cared for the children that actually lived in their homes, while 60 percent were their biological children.

Patel said the study had shown that the grant gave very poor women access to resources, enabling them to make decisions and control their finances.

  • Lacrimose - 2012-03-07 00:01

    And what proportion of grant recipients go on to contribute to our miniscule tax base? I'm not arguing the merits/de-merits of grants. I'm asking how this is measured all the way back to the fiscus. Fine and dandy if we end up with more employABLE and so swelling the income. Not so good if that is all there is, i.e. the same/similar govt income having to support an ever-increasing grant-dependency. We hear mad numbers being bandied about already - 75% of some budgets purely on welfare. Where's the sustainability?

  • Wesley - 2012-03-07 05:05

    This study was done over the 5% of grants that end up at the right place. Not the 95% of the corruption

  • Tigra - 2012-03-07 07:56

    The study size was too tiny to give meaningful results. It took them 3 years to come to this conclusion... Probably 3 years of cooking to get the results they wanted...

  • pages:
  • 1