ConCourt to rule on constitutionality of affirmative action, BEE

2017-11-02 21:38
Minister Michael Masutha. (Lisa Hnatowicz/Foto24)

Minister Michael Masutha. (Lisa Hnatowicz/Foto24) (Lisa Hnatowicz/Foto24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg – Justice Minister Michael Masutha's legal representative argued in the Constitutional Court on Thursday that the Department of Justice's racial quota system ensures access to work for black people and women. 

Trade union Solidarity and the South African Restructuring and Insolvency Practitioners' Association (Saripa) do not agree.

Head of Solidarity's Centre for Fair Labour Practices Anton van der Bijl said the hearing comes after the Western Cape High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Solidarity and Saripa following the abolition of the Department of Justice's appointment policy insofar as liquidators are concerned.

Advocate Renata Williams SC faced a full bench of justices on Thursday in her defence of the validity of the policy for the appointment of liquidators.

In her argument, Williams said the policy guaranteed transformation through the appointment of women and black people.

"What lies at the heart of this policy is the transformation of the insolvency profession... There is access to work. People are not going to be forced out of work because they don't have the support of the creditors," she said. 

Williams said the policy was "aimed at addressing historical imbalances".

Desires of creditors not taken into account

The appeals court in December 2016 found that the policy was unlawful and invalid.

A 2001 version of the policy made provision for previously disadvantaged people to be appointed as co-provisional trustees in every estate.

The new policy drawn up for implementation in 2014 changed the structuring of appointments, creating four categories for those with the relevant qualifications and experience.

Category A represented African, Coloured, Indian and Chinese females who became South African citizens before April 27, 1994; B represented their male equivalents; C represented white females who were South African citizens before April 27, 1994, and D represented anyone who became a South African citizen on or after April 27, 1994, as well as white males.

These individuals would be appointed according to a ratio of A:4 B:3, C:2, D:1. The names would be listed alphabetically, and it is in this order that they would be selected.

The Master of the High Court of South Africa was then obliged to appoint insolvency practitioners according to this ratio across all classes of appointment, and was to no longer take into account the desires of creditors.

Judgment was reserved.

Read more on:    solidarity  |  michael masutha  |  courts

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.