Court dismisses AfriForum's urgent bid to interdict Parliament's land expropriation report

2018-11-30 10:18
High Court. (Duncan Alfreds, News24)

High Court. (Duncan Alfreds, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

AfriForum's urgent application to interdict the adoption of the Constitutional Review Committee's first report into land expropriation without compensation has been dismissed.

The Western Cape High Court on Friday dismissed the urgent application that MPs be interdicted from moving to adopt the committee's report in the National Assembly on Tuesday.

After arguments were heard on Thursday, judges Vincent Saldanha and Nape Dolamo delivered their judgement on Friday.

This relates only to the first part of AfriForum's case - the argument to hear the matter urgently.

The second part of the application is to have the report reviewed and set aside, which will be heard at a later date.

The Joint Constitutional Review Committee adopted the report on November 15, recommending that section 25 of the Constitution should be amended to allow expropriation without compensation.

The gist of AfriForum's case is that the public participation process was flawed because about 176 000 of the hundreds of thousands of written submissions that the committee received were deemed duplications and not considered in the report.

On Thursday, Advocate Etienne Labuschagne, SC, appearing for AfriForum, argued that this means that the opinions of the thousands of people who supported AfriForum and sent submissions via AfriForum's website were discounted.

Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, who appeared for Parliament, described AfriForum's case as "embarrassing" at least three times, and said the Joint Constitutional Review Committee's report stated that the majority of written submissions were opposed to amending section 25, thus AfriForum's views had been taken into account.

Judges Saldanha and Dolamo also questioned whether AfriForum was trying to interfere in the work of Parliament, in which case it should have gone to the Constitutional Court.

The dismissal of the urgent application means the report can be debated and adopted on Tuesday if Parliament so chooses.

The process will now go through a number of phases.

The report recommends Parliament appoint a mechanism to draft the wording of an amendment and that this must be done before before the 2019 general elections.

This process around the wording of the amendment will require another public participation process and will have to be passed with a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly.

Read more on:    afriforum  |  cape town  |  parliament  |  land  |  land expropriation without compensation
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

 
/News
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.