DA casts further doubt on Mpshe's reasoning on Zuma charges

2016-06-10 20:23
Mokotedi Mpshe (Beeld)

Mokotedi Mpshe (Beeld)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pretoria - The Democratic Alliance on Friday cast further doubt on former NPA head Mokotedi Mpshe's reasoning in deciding not to prosecute President Jacob Zuma seven years ago.  

On April 6, 2009, Mpshe had stated that transcripts of telephone conversations between then-Scorpions boss Leonard McCarthy and former NPA boss Bulelani Ngcuka showed that there had been political contamination in the decision to charge Zuma on more than 700 corruption charges.

The discussion between the two was said to be about the timing of serving Zuma with the indictment ahead of the ANC's elective conference where Zuma challenged then-president Thabo Mbeki for the party's leadership.

Mpshe dropped the charges against Zuma shortly before the national elections which resulted in Zuma taking the presidential seat.

Earlier this year, the High Court found that Mpshe had acted irrationally.

On Friday David Borgstrom questioned why, if Mpshe felt so strongly about the political conspiracy, did he not take action against McCarthy.

"If McCarthy had acted so badly, action would have been taken to avoid repetition," said Borgstrom.

Instead, Mpshe said he would further investigate the matter. Nothing ever came of this.

Zuma has the power

Borgstrom was presenting arguments before the High Court in Pretoria where the NPA and Zuma’s lawyers wanted leave to appeal the court’s April 29, 2016, decision to review and set aside Mpshe's 2009 decision to not prosecute Zuma.

The NPA argued that the High Court had erred when it ruled that Zuma should face the charges outlined in the 2009 indictment.

Hilton Epstein for the NPA explained that once the corruption case against Zuma was struck off the roll seven years ago, it was up to the National Director of Public Prosecutions to decide which charges it wished to reinstate or drop, not the court.

Judgment in the matter was reserved.

Speaking after the adjournment, Democratic Alliance leader, Mmusi Maimane said Zuma had the power to conclude this matter once and for all.

"Certainly our invitation to the NPA is to charge Jacob Zuma. This is simply the quickest way of dealing with this matter. If Jacob Zuma doesn't have a case to answer for, then let him prove that in court but actually all these delays that are carrying on for weeks and months on end are actually a waste of taxpayers money," said Maimane.

He estimated that millions of state funds had already been pumped in to the lengthy court case.

Read more on:    da  |  npa  |  mokotedi mpshe  |  mmusi maimane  |  jacob zuma  |  pretoria  |  politics

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.