Gordhan files review application, asks court to set aside Mkhwebane's report

2019-05-28 12:34
Pravin Gordhan  (File, Felix Dlangamandla, Netwerk24)

Pravin Gordhan (File, Felix Dlangamandla, Netwerk24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Lawyers for Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan have filed a review application asking the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to set aside a report by Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane that found he flouted the Constitution.

In addition, he will also ask the court for a declaratory order that Mkhwebane, who has had two reports set aside by the High Court already, did not act in accordance with the Constitution or the Public Protector Act.

The application was lodged on Tuesday morning in Pretoria.

In a notice of motion lodged, Gordhan's attorneys say he will ask the court to set aside both Mkhwebane's decision to investigate and the subsequent report as "unconstitutional, unlawful, irrational and invalid".

He will also seek a punitive costs order against Mkhwebane.

The report's findings relate to the early retirement of former SARS deputy commissioner Ivan Pillay. He retired before the mandatory retirement age in 2010 and receved full benefits. He was subsequently appointed on a fixed contract at SARS before resigning in the wake of Tom Moyane's appointment as SARS commissioner in 2015.

Also read: Revenue Service studying Public Protector report, as Gordhan vows legal challenge

Last week, EFF leader Julius Malema warned President Cyril Ramaphosa against appointing Gordhan to his Cabinet, saying the Public Protector's report must be respected. Gordhan is Ramaphosa's spearhead in efforts to reform government and state-owned enterprises and, as former minister of finance and commissioner of SARS, is acutely aware of malfeasance and wrongdoing.

The EFF's campaign against Gordhan and Mkhwebane's report is considered by Gordhan's supporters as part of a broader effort to prevent him from returning to Cabinet.

Reports set aside

The Gauteng High Court in Pretoria last week also set aside Mkhwebane's report into the Estina dairy project, a major site of state capture, severely criticising her investigation as flawed and inadequate.

The court found that she had neglected to consider evidence in the public domain, she had narrowed the scope of the investigation, and was either unaware of the powers of her office or incompetent.

An earlier report about Absa and the SA Reserve Bank was also set aside by the court, who found that Mkhwebane "does not fully understand her constitutional duty to be impartial and to perform her functions without fear, favour or prejudice".

In her report about the Pillay pension issue, Mkhwebane found that Gordhan flouted the law, procedures and the Constitution in approving Pillay’s application for early retirement with full benefits. She found that Gordhan did not have the legal authority to grant early retirement with full benefits and that he used the wrong legal provisions in doing so.

Mkhwebane has instructed Ramaphosa to take disciplinary action against Gordhan and SARS to recoup the pension payments made to Pillay. Both the Presidency and SARS must report back to the Public Protector within 30 days.

In their submissions to Mkhwebane, Gordhan - and other affected parties, including Pillay and former SARS commissioner Oupa Magashula - argued that Mkhwebane was mistaken in her conclusions and that she had made factual errors, as well as mistakes in legal interpretations. Both Pillay and Magashula have indicated they will also take the report in review.

PP vs Gordhan: 5 key quotes from Mkhwebane's report

Charges withdrawed

The complaint was lodged by an anonymous person on November 18, 2016, days after charges relating to the pension arrangement against Gordhan, Pillay and Magashula were dropped and Mkhwebane succeeded Thuli Madonsela as Public Protector.

Then national director of public prosecutions Shaun Abrahams said he had decided to withdraw the charges against the three men after representations were made to the NPA.

In his final report into governance issues at SARS, retired Judge Robert Nugent also couldn’t find any irregularities related to Pillay’s early retirement, saying: "There is no apparent reason why Mr Moyane would be asking for an opinion on the lawfulness of Mr Pillay’s pension arrangement, when no issue had arisen around it…"

Gordhan’s attorneys have in the past extensively detailed the process that SARS and National Treasury followed before a decision about Pillay’s pension was taken, including legal opinions by SARS internal legal advisors, as well as an external legal opinion and consultations with the director-general of the Department of Public Service and Administration.

Gordhan, then minister of finance, granted Pillay retirement with full benefits after a consultation period of three months.

* This is a developing story.

KEEP UPDATED on the latest news by subscribing to our FREE newsletter.

- FOLLOW News24 on Twitter

Read more on:    gordhan  |  busi­siwe mkhwebane  |  cyril ramapahosa  |  julius  |  pravin  |  malema  |  public protector

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.