Judgment reserved in Basson's HPCSA appeal

2016-02-10 17:28
Wouter Basson (Picture: AFP)

Wouter Basson (Picture: AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - Judgment was reserved in cardiologist Dr Wouter Basson's review application to set aside a decision by two members of the HPCSA's professional conduct committee not to recuse themselves from the proceedings against him.

The matter was heard in the High Court in Pretoria from Tuesday and was concluded on Wednesday.

The apartheid-era chemical warfare expert filed the application, saying he believed the two committee members were biased.

In December 2013, the Health Professions Council of SA's (HPCSA's) committee, headed by Professor Jannie Hugo, found Basson guilty on four counts of unprofessional and unethical conduct as a medical doctor when he headed the apartheid government's chemical and biological warfare programme between 1981 and 1992.

The committee found Basson acted unethically when he co-ordinated the large-scale production of illegal psychoactive drugs, equipped mortars with teargas, and provided military operatives with disorientating substances to facilitate illegal cross-border kidnappings.

It found he acted unethically by making cyanide for South African soldiers so they could commit suicide if captured, and that he had violated the medical ethical principle of "first do no harm".

Last January, the High Court ruled that Basson was entitled to lodge a recusal application against the members of the committee and interdicted the committee from continuing in Basson's absence.

The proceedings before the HPCSA had been stayed pending the application of Basson's review application.

Basson alleged the conduct of Hugo and fellow committee member Professor Eddie Mhlanga created a perception of bias.

He said in an affidavit that their conduct should be seen in light of the fact that they had granted the prosecution a postponement of almost a year to search the world for an expert to contradict concessions another expert had made in his favour.

When his hearing started in 2007, the respondents were already siding with the prosecution, he said.

Basson's advocate, Jaap Cilliers, said the fact that Basson was forced to go to court before Hugo admitted being a member of the Medical Association, which agitated for his removal from the roll, showed he was biased.

This was despite Hugo's protestation that he never signed the petition.

Mhlanga was a member of the Rural Doctor's Association, which also signed a petition calling for Basson's removal.

The two petitions were allowed as evidence in aggravation of sentence, despite Basson's objections.

Read more on:    hpcsa  |  wouter basson  |  pretoria

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.