Legal dispute over Wendy house at upmarket estate

2016-11-22 21:03
Midstream Estate (Facebook)

Midstream Estate (Facebook)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pretoria - A disagreement over a wooden structure in the upmarket Midstream Estate in Centurion has led to a lawsuit.

Christo and Christa Oberholzer, who live in extension 3 of the estate, were ordered by the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on November 6 last year to remove the structure, Netwerk24 reported.

The order said they had to remove the "Wendy house" or similar structure within 20 days.

However, the Oberholzers hit back with a court application to have the order reviewed.

Their review application was rejected on Friday and the couple were ordered to pay costs.

The Midstream homeowners' association told the Oberholzers in 2014 that they were violating aesthetic and house rules with the structure.

The association was eventually able to obtain an order against the Oberholzers in November 2015.

The Oberholzers say the order against them was obtained incorrectly and in their absence. They did not know that the court case against them would go ahead. 


They said in court papers that the "playhouse" was for their daughter, who has Down syndrome. It was meant to stimulate the child's sensory and motor skills, and was never meant to be a "Wendy house".

However, the association said the crux of the matter is that the Oberholzers did not inform it in time that the structure was a playhouse for the child. The couple could have said so in a letter sent to the association on March 16, 2015.

The association said the parties had agreed on October 20, 2015, that the Oberholzers would ask their daughter's occupational therapist to motivate for the structure staying on their property. A final decision would have been taken after the association received the report.

The couple got the report on November 1, 2015, but only sent it to the association on November 30, despite knowing that the court case would be heard on November 6, 2015.

The association said the Oberholzers are not ignorant people and are "the architects of their own misfortune". The sheriff served the order on them.

Rules should apply to everyone 

The Oberholzers claimed in their review application that the parties had come to an agreement over the structure and that the court could therefore not have issued an order against them.

However, the association said there had been no such agreement. Had that been the case, the court would not have ruled against the couple.

The association says there are 1 571 houses on the estate and rules should apply to everyone.

If people are allowed to build an illegal structure, proper reasons should be given, so that the decision is fair to all the residents.

For this reason, it had been essential that the child's medical report be submitted by her parents on time.

Read more on:    pretoria

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.