Molefe could 'obstruct' investigations - DA

2017-05-15 20:23
James Selfe (Netwerk24)

James Selfe (Netwerk24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


WATCH: Protests outside, dancing inside — Molefe returns to mixed reactions

2017-05-15 14:20

Brian Molefe entered Eskom’s Megawatt Park to song and dance on Monday as he was welcomed back as chief executive. Watch.WATCH

Cape Town - The reinstatement of Brian Molefe as Eskom CEO places him in a "position to frustrate or obstruct" any investigations against him, the DA says in court papers.

The party on Monday brought an application in the High Court in Pretoria, asking it to rule Molefe's reinstatement by Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown irrational and unlawful. 

It firstly wants the court to interdict Molefe from performing any duties or functions as Eskom CEO and from receiving any benefits associated with the position and, secondly, to set aside his appointment.

"The Public Protector and the Minister have called for full investigations into transactions overseen by Mr Molefe. The reinstatement of Mr Molefe to the position of Group Chief Executive places Mr Molefe in a position to frustrate or obstruct any such investigations against him," DA federal executive chairperson James Selfe says in the affidavit. 

Molefe's reappointment, and subsequent resignation as ANC MP, came to light on Friday. Brown said reappointing Molefe "represents a significantly better value proposition to the South African fiscus" than a R30m pension payout.

She said the R30m figure was reached in terms of the provisions of Eskom's pension fund, governed by the Pensions Fund Act.

"The appointment/reinstatement of Mr Molefe is in breach of the requirements of the relevant legal framework and is irrational," Selfe says.

"The minister ought instead to have accepted neither the proposal of payment of R30m in pension benefits to Mr Molefe, nor the proposal that he be reinstated to the position of Group Chief Executive at Eskom.”

Had Brown acted lawfully and rationally, she ought to have rejected both options as unjustifiable and unlawful.

Selfe disputes that Molefe went on early retirement, as he was 50 and not 55, and even if he had gone on early retirement, a R30m pension payout would be "inconceivable". 

Brown, Molefe and Eskom are the respondents in the matter, which the DA wants to be heard on May 30. They are expected to file responding affidavits by Wednesday.

Read more on:    da  |  eskom  |  brian molefe  |  james selfe  |  lynne brown  |  cape town  |  politics 2017

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.