Nkandla ruling one of the most important ConCourt judgments - expert

2016-03-31 13:16
(Genevieve Quintal, News24)

(Genevieve Quintal, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories


ANALYSIS: End of the road on Nkandla, time to pay back

2016-03-31 12:14

A constitutional expert says there is no appeal on the Constitutional Court judgment.WATCH

Cape Town – The highest court in the land, the Constitutional Court, understood the fundamental importance of the Nkandla matter and took its time to clarify parties’ powers and responsibilities, an expert told News24 on Thursday.

"It realised that this is a critical case that is going to be a precedent for a long time to come, a judgment that will be studied by scholars for many, many years," said Lawson Naidoo, executive secretary of the Council for the Advancement of the SA Constitution.

"It’s really probably one of the most important judgments by the Constitutional Court in our democratic era. There is no appeal from here."

Democracy strengthened

Naidoo said the judgment was a victory for the Constitution and the rule of law, and a day "in which democracy had been strengthened".

It also showed that nobody was above the law, even President Jacob Zuma.

An important aspect was that the court had made declaratory orders that both Zuma and the National Assembly were in breach of their constitutional obligations.

The court found it was duty-bound to rule on that, Naidoo said.

At the same time, Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng was very clear on the separation of powers and stated the conditions under which the judiciary was empowered to step into the political domain.

Naidoo said that, in ordering the National Treasury to report back to it on the amount to be paid by Zuma, the court had taken on the responsibility of ensuring the Public Protector’s remedial action was in fact implemented.

Powers of Public Protector

There had been divided opinion on Public Protector Thuli Madonsela’s role until quite recently, even among legal experts, he said.

The judgment had now given teeth to the office of the Public Protector.

Naidoo said the judgment explained the nature and extent of the Public Protector’s powers and the different remedies it could use to resolve disputes.

On another aspect, the court found it was not acceptable to choose a political route to challenge, undermine and overrule the Public Protector’s findings.

"The way to do that was to do a judicial review of the Public Protector’s report, and on that basis, to challenge the report. The president opted not to do that, but rather to use the minister of police and Parliament to try and achieve the very same objective."

Read more on:    public protector  |  casac  |  thuli madonsela  |  jacob zuma  |  nkandla upgrade

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.