Cape Town - The presidency is outraged by former public protector Thuli Madonsela's comment to eNCA that President Jacob Zuma could be involved in an alleged agenda against her over pension deductions.Madonsela told eNCA in a recorded interview on Saturday that the current spat with her successor Busisiwe Mkhwebane over deductions to her pension may be a result of interference from the President or the State Security Agency or both.Presidency spokesperson Dr Bongani Ngqulunga on Saturday said that Madonsela's utterances that she is being "targeted" by the President were preposterous."The President does not play any role when it comes to salary and conditions of service of the Public Protector," Ngqulunga responded in a statement."It is unfortunate that Advocate Madonsela decided to use the President's name in matters which do not involve him."The abuse of the name of the President in such a matter is preposterous and disappointing."Ngqulunga said it was Parliament that determined the Public Protector's remuneration and conditions of service, according to section 2(2) of the Public Protector Act."The Presidency urges Advocate Madonsela to refrain from such conduct," he added.'Illegal' pension deductionsMadonsela told eNCA that she suspects there was an agenda behind her tensions with Mkhwebane over her pension."I have no evidence, but I suspect that either President Zuma or people linked to him are behind what's happening at the Public Protector's office," she told the broadcaster."I have no evidence, but I suspect that the State Security Agency is behind some of the things that happened in my office before the [new] Public Protector was appointed and what has happened since then."Madonsela has said previously that money was illegally deducted from her pension since leaving office last year, reportedly as a result of costs incurred by an accident her son was involved in while driving a state vehicle and her continued use of the vehicle after her term ended.She revealed that the figure is in the range of R470 000."I haven't decided how to proceed because honestly I would just like to move on with my life. It's not my style or interest to be entangled in a legal battle with the Public Protector."When asked if she thought it was an act of vengeance for her work on both her Nkandla report and State of Capture report, she said it was possible, but had no evidence.She also said it was "bizarre" that she has never met Mkhwebane personally, and that attempts to do so had failed during the handover phase.However, she did not want to speak out against Mkhwebane, reaffirming her stance that it is not collegial to speak out on one's successor.