Press Council appeals panel explains ruling on HuffPost 'white men' blog

2017-08-22 13:40
Verashni Pillay (Twitter)

Verashni Pillay (Twitter)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - A controversial blog that HuffPost SA published in April, entitled "Could it be time to deny white men the franchise", cannot be seen as discriminatory or classified as hate speech, the appeals panel of the Press Council ruled on Tuesday.

Appeals panel chair Judge Bernard Ngoepe had been tasked with considering whether the Press Ombudsman ruled correctly that the blog had breached the press code of ethics and conduct for these reasons.

Ombudsman Johan Retief had said the blog violated numerous sections of the code, and had "contributed to the erosion of public trust in the media".

"I accept that the text itself did not directly propagate violence - but if the actions it advocates were ever put into practice, they might well lead to just that," he said at the time, when labelling the content of the blog as hate speech.

READ: 'White men' blog was not hate speech - panel

He deemed the breaches of the code to be tier 3 offences, which amounted to serious misconduct.

Civil body AfriForum and other complainants had approached the Press Council following the publication of the blog online.

The blog was written by "Shelley Garland", who was described as an activist and feminist, completing an MA degree in philosophy.

Huffpost SA retracted the piece when they could not verify Garland's identity.

'Far cry from being denigratory'

It then emerged that Garland was a pseudonym that political science graduate Marius Roodt had used when writing the piece.

His actions were apparently motivated by a desire to highlight the state of journalism and editorial practices in the country.

Revealed: Here is Shelley Garland... And Why He Did It

He resigned from his position as researcher at the Centre for Development and Enterprise.

Verashni Pillay resigned as editor of HuffPost SA following the ombudsman's findings on April 22.

She later lodged an appeal.

Ngoepe first looked at complaints and the subsequent ruling that the blog had unfairly discriminated against white men.

"In the present case, as Mr Winks for the appellant pointed out, the blog conveys the very opposite about white men: It portrays them as being virtually superhuman, powerful and dominant," said Ngoepe.

"This depiction of them is a far cry from being denigratory. We, therefore, disagree with the Ombud's ruling that the piece amounted to discrimination."

He then dealt with the finding that the blog advocated hate speech on the grounds of race and gender.

Ngoepe said that for something to amount to hate speech, it had to not only advocate hatred, but also be an incitement to cause harm.

'Nothing more than a spoof'

He said the appeals panel felt the piece did not pass this test.

"As Mr Budlender for the amici curiae pointed out, the piece is neither aggressive nor inflammatory; if anything, it is faux academic: Measured and seeking to persuade through reasoning. How persuasive the reasoning is, is of course another matter."

It was hard to see the piece causing white men to be disenfranchised, said Ngoepe.

This would be impossible in any event, given South Africa's constitutional principles.

"The call was for them to be disenfranchised, but how real was the risk of that materialising? In this respect, there is much to be said for the argument that the blog was nothing more than a spoof," he said.

"It could well be that the piece irritated or annoyed some people, but to classify it as a hate speech would be too huge a jump. Therefore, we are afraid that here too, we disagree with the Ombud."

He, thus, set aside the Ombudsman's ruling.

In a tweet on Tuesday, Pillay thanked her lawyer Ben Winks for taking on the case pro bono.

She suggested that the ombudsman needed to be held accountable for the original judgment.

* HuffPost SA and News24 are both owned by Media24

Read more on:    verashni pillay  |  cape town  |  racism  |  media  |  hate speech  |  media freedom

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
ADVERTORIAL
Competition regulation for a growing and inclusive economy

ADVERTORIAL: The Competition Commission of South Africa is conducting advocacy work in the South African automotive aftermarket industry and has gazetted a Draft Code of Conduct for public comment.

/News
 

5 top leg exercises for men

Here’s our selection of the five best leg exercises that you can do in the comfort of your own home.

 
 

You won't want to miss...

WATCH: Pornhub is giving users free access to premium content this holidays
5 top leg exercises for men
10 best dressed men of 2017
How to open a beer bottle without an opener
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.