Rohde murder trial: State questions impartiality of defence pathologist's report

2017-10-16 14:14
State pathologist Akmal Coetzee-Khan in the Western Cape High Court on Monday. (James de Villiers, News24)

State pathologist Akmal Coetzee-Khan in the Western Cape High Court on Monday. (James de Villiers, News24)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town – A post-mortem report, completed at the request of murder accused Jason Rohde a week after his wife's death, omitted key evidence which could cast doubt over its "impartiality", the Western Cape High Court heard on Wednesday.

Rohde is accused of murdering his wife, Susan, at the Spier Wine Estate last year.

State pathologist Dr Akmal Coetzee-Khan determined that Susan had died from a lack of oxygen, following manual strangulation and smothering.

Rohde requested an independent post-mortem from Dr Reggie Perumal.

AS IT HAPPENED: Overlooked injuries in second autopsy - Jason Rohde murder trial

However, in court on Monday, Coetzee-Khan testified about several concerns he had with Perumal's report.

These included that:

- Perumal overlooked injuries to Susan's neck which, in his view, are important to determine that she was strangled by hand;

- Perumal did not request photographs of Susan’s body before completing the post-mortem and making dissections;

- Perumal overlooked injuries on Susan's left hand, as well as blood present in her stomach and intestines. 

Coetzee-Khan pointed out that it was nearly impossible to restore neck tissue to its original form after a post-mortem.

"How could Perumal complete a post-mortem on the neck if he doesn't know in what condition the tissue was in before dissection," he asked.

Possible confrontation

He said he was "really concerned about the findings of Perumal's report" and the impartiality of the findings made.

Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe asked Coetzee-Khan whether Rohde's version of events, that a confrontation occurred before Susan's death, corresponded with her injuries. 

However, he responded that he was not provided with the specifics of the confrontation to "map out" which injuries occurred from the altercation.

He said Susan's injuries to her knuckles and scarring to her legs could have been caused in a confrontation.

However, the injuries to her neck were still not explained, he added.

Coetzee-Khan told the court that the bruising to Susan's eye was consistent with direct contact, which could have been caused by Rohde hitting her with the back of his arm.

Coetzee-Khan has not yet been cross-examined.

Judge Salie-Hlophe postponed the matter to Wednesday afternoon at the request of Rohde's counsel, Pete Mihalik.

Dressed in a dark blue suit, Rohde appeared relaxed throughout the court proceedings. 

Read more on:    jason rohde  |  susan rohde  |  cape town  |  courts  |  crime
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.