Security row in court

2017-12-12 13:45

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

PMB Security obtained a temporary urgent interdict in the Pietermaritzburg high court on Monday against a Blackridge man to prevent him from spreading allegedly defamatory statements about the company.

In his replying affidavit the resident, Willie Seymour, however, denies that any statements he made were defamatory or were untrue. He also maintains the security company is “not entitled to immunity from criticism”.

The case arose after Seymour called PMB Security on Monday, December 4, asking them to send armed response to a burglary in progress in another road in the area­. According to court documents, the controller who took the call, was “confused” and struggled to assist Seymour.

In her affidavit, the director of PMB Security Mary Ann Jeffrey said he was demanding they dispatch personnel to assist in preventing a burglary at a property “in respect of which there was no contract in place” with PMB Security. It seemed he was well aware of this.

“He adopted an aggressive stance,” she said, stating he would cancel his contract if they failed to do so. Jeffrey alleges that Seymour took it upon himself to post the conversation on WhatsApp and the statements made their way “onto multiple WhatsApp security groups”. They were even mentioned in an article in The Witness.

In his affidavit, Seymour admits he posted the conversations on three Blackridge community group chats “only”, but denies posting them on any policing forums. Seymour said he found the application unnecessary and denied that the call recordings were defamatory.

However, he said he removed all the recordings from social media as soon as he received the notice of the court action.

Seymour said it was unclear to him which of his words were allegedly defamatory of PMB Security and also denied his remarks were untrue.

He said PMB Security’s “right not to have its good name maligned, slandered or defamed” was “not absolute” and that the company was not “entitled to immunity from criticism”.

He said when Jeffreys told him that she intended referring the matter to her attorneys she didn’t threaten to bring an urgent interdict. He assumed she meant that she intended suing him for defamation.

“I shall defend any such action,” he said.

In terms of the interim court order obtained by PMB Security, Seymour is restrained from publishing or sending any defamatory material regarding PMB Security, its management or staff “in any format whatsoever”. He was also ordered to remove any defamatory content regarding the company from social media within 24 hours.

The case returns to court on February 13 next year.


Read more on:    pietermaritzburg  |  court case

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X

Inside News24

 
/News
Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.
 
English
Afrikaans
isiZulu

Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Settings

Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.




Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.