The ConCourt's Abrahams judgment: 10 things you need to know

2018-08-13 11:36
The former National Prosecuting Authority advocate Shaun Abrahams. (Jaco Marais, Gallo Images, Rapport)

The former National Prosecuting Authority advocate Shaun Abrahams. (Jaco Marais, Gallo Images, Rapport)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

The Constitutional Court on Monday dealt a devastating blow to former president Jacob Zuma, national director of public prosecutions (NDPP) Shaun Abrahams and the National Prosecuting Authority.

OVERVIEW: ConCourt rules Abrahams' appointment invalid, Ramaphosa given 90 days to appoint new NPA boss

Here are 10 things you need to know about this landmark judgment:

    1. It found that the golden handshake given to former NDPP Mxolisi Nxasana was unconstitutional and invalid and that the subsequent appointment of Shaun Abrahams as NDPP was also unconstitutional and invalid.

    2. The court's judgment in effect means that Abrahams is no longer the NDPP and that he must vacate his office immediately.

    3. Abrahams has no recourse to any other court or process ­ this is it for him. The judgment however does not invalidate any decision he has taken while in office.

    4. President Cyril Ramaphosa has been ordered by the country's apex court to appoint a new NDPP within 90 days.

    5. The court was scathing about Zuma and the manner in which he went about gerrymandering and manipulating Mxolisi Nxasana to resign as NDPP.

    6. It said the chronology of events led the court to the conclusion that Zuma was attempting to buy-off an NDPP with whom he did not agree.

    7. Stability at the NPA, which is in a "sorry state" and has been engulfed in controversy for years, is of paramount importance in a constitutional democracy, the court said.

    8. Nxasana does not escape the court's ire either. It says Nxasana took the money and ran, and that although he was put under pressure, it was not the conduct of someone holding such a high office.

    9. The court found that the stability of the NPA is of such import that it would not be wise to reinstate Nxasana and that he must return the more than R10m paid to him.

    10. A minority judgment, however, found that Nxasana should return to the office of the NDPP and that the president can institute commission of inquiry should he wish to do so.





KEEP UPDATED on the latest news by subscribing to our FREE newsletter.

- FOLLOW News24 on Twitter

Read more on:    npa  |  shaun abrahams  |  jacob zuma  |  judiciary  |  courts

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.