Oscar's defence enters critical phase

2014-05-05 05:30
Oscar Pistorius (Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

Oscar Pistorius (Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Pretoria - Oscar Pistorius's murder trial enters a critical phase on Monday as his defence team attempts to recover from a faltering start and reinforce the Paralympian's claim that he fatally shot girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp by mistake because he was overwhelmed by a long-held fear of violent crime.

Pistorius's mindset when he stood on his stumps in a bathroom and pulled the trigger on his 9mm pistol in the early hours of 14 February 2013 remains the crux of the trial that has captured worldwide attention and is about to start its seventh week of globally televised proceedings.

It was initially scheduled to run for three weeks.

Judge Thokozile Masipa will analyse thousands of pages of testimony before she reaches a verdict, but ultimately must ponder the pivotal question: Did Pistorius fire his gun with the intention to kill or out of a misplaced belief that his life was in danger from a perceived intruder?

Masipa will decide, with the help of two assessors, if Pistorius's overall account is believable and whether the apparent inconsistencies in his testimony count against him or are unimportant in the bigger picture.

If Pistorius's defence, which will resume calling witnesses on Monday after a two-week trial recess, can show that his story of a tragic error is a reasonable explanation, even the double-amputee runner's shaky testimony would be rendered irrelevant and the judge should acquit him of murder, legal experts say.


While testifying, Pistorius sometimes contradicted earlier testimony and other times said he did not remember details.

"The test doesn't end there," former state prosecutor Marius du Toit said of Pistorius's testimony. "It's not over. They [the defence] can still show there is another plausible scenario."

Du Toit has over 20 years' experience in South Africa's criminal justice system and is following the trial closely. He said it must be shown that Pistorius had the "sole intention" to kill Steenkamp to be convicted of murder.

Pistorius, 27, doesn't dispute that he shot 29-year-old Steenkamp through a toilet door. He claims the killing was accidental and he fired four times in quick succession without thinking and while terrified, believing that an intruder had climbed up a ladder and through a bathroom window of his Pretoria villa in the pre-dawn hours and was about to come out of the cubicle and attack him.

Prosecutors charge that the story is an intricate lie designed to cover up a murder. They say the couple fought, Steenkamp fled to the toilet screaming and Pistorius followed her and shot her through the wooden door while they were arguing. She was hit in the hip, arm and head.

More defence witnesses

Charged with premeditated murder, Pistorius faces 25 years to life in prison if convicted.

The prosecution's case appeared to be bolstered as holes in Pistorius's story were exposed when the athlete was on the stand for a fierce five-day cross-examination by prosecutor Gerrie Nel.

Nel also succeeded in undermining the evidence given by the defence's first two expert witnesses, a pathologist and a former police forensic scientist.

But defence lawyers have only presented three of up to 17 witnesses they say they may ask to testify.

At the outset of the defence's case, lawyer Barry Roux said Pistorius's actions on Valentine's Day last year centred on his "disability" and "vulnerability" and Pistorius's team will likely seek to rebuild the overall argument that his actions were guided by fear and not anger in a country with a high rate of violent home invasions.

Roux said he will also show that a crucial thread of the prosecution's case is not true; that neighbours heard a woman screaming before and during the shots fired by Pistorius at around 03:17 on the fatal night.

The lawyer said neighbours who live closer to Pistorius's house never heard a woman scream.

Instead, it was Pistorius's high-pitched shrieks for help after realising his terrible mistake, the defence argues.

Read more on:    gerrie nel  |  reeva steenkamp  |  oscar pistorius  |  barry roux  |  thokozile masipa  |  pretoria  |  pistorius trial

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.


24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.