ConCourt assessment not untoward: Zuma

2012-02-16 19:52

Cape Town - Plans to assess the impact of the decisions of the superior courts was not an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary, President Jacob Zuma said on Thursday.

"The courts, led by the Constitutional Court, through their judgments, continue to make an indelible mark in the transformation of society to realise the vision set out in the Constitution," he told the National Assembly in reply to points raised during debate on his State of the Nation address.

The impact assessment would be undertaken this year.

"This assessment is with a view to reflect on the impact of the constitutional jurisprudence in the past 17 years of our democracy towards the realisation of the transformation goals envisaged by the Constitution," Zuma said.

The assessment would also focus on the role of the other arms of the state in giving effect to the court judgments.

"We reiterate that this exercise must not be viewed as an attempt by government to undermine the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law which are entrenched in our Constitution," Zuma said.

"It is, in reality, the enhancement of our constitutional democracy. We reaffirm our firm belief in the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary and of all three arms of the state."

The assessment exercise fell within the mandate of the executive, "of formulating and reviewing policies of government", he said.

There was nothing unusual or untoward about it, he said.

Constitutions the world over were "dynamic and subject to review".

"In recognition of this fact, the Constitution provides that it must be reviewed at least annually by Parliament, in terms of Section 45(1)(c). That is why there is the constitutional review committee in Parliament.

"And therefore reviewing these matters is not a matter foreign to what our Constitution dictates. We are actually within our mandate," Zuma said.

  • Kim - 2012-02-16 20:09

    SA has one of the best Constitutions in the world but with the idiots we have in Parliament, it is just ink on paper.

      Francois - 2012-02-16 21:09

      Don't you think that the problem is that Parliament listens to government and not the other way round? Thus the "brains" of the ruling party is not sitting in Parliament where governance should take place, but in Lithuli House where governance actually do take place and Lithuli House is not responsible to the people (yet).

  • Cracker - 2012-02-16 20:20

    So if nothing will change then nothing will change. No reason to attach any meaning to the utterances of the state president. He was just filling his allotted time in Parliament with meaningless words.

  • norman.buchalter - 2012-02-16 20:32

    Men like Ramaposa, De Klerk, Bizos, Mandela, Chaskelson, Sacks? et al , all who had a part in writing our "world class' constitution , mean nothing to the bunch of illiterate but street smart ANC MP's who are trying their best to destroy rather than uphold our democracy. History will judge them as harshly as their intended actions. You can't brow beat the people into subservience forever.

  • Max - 2012-02-16 20:49

    Day after day this bunch of clowns provide empirical proof that Verwoerd was a very wise man.

  • Elena - 2012-02-16 22:09

    Max Verwoed was an insane criminal. The ruling party can not afford to govern under the present constitution, with a majority unbiased concourt, as they could only appoint a few biased, unqualified judges of questionable morality, they have to limit the concourt powers.

  • Adam - 2012-02-28 17:18

    With all this money being wasted, the voters are changing, especially the poor, and I suggest we speak to as many as possible and explain to those without TV and illiterate, that voting for an opposition party will do them no harm.I do this on a daily basis. Soon the anc will be out. They are already cracking up.

  • pages:
  • 1