DA: Eskom must explain catering contracts

2015-05-03 14:40
(Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

(Gianluigi Guercia, AFP)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Johannesburg - The Democratic Alliance on Sunday said it wants Eskom to explain to Parliament why the cash-strapped parastatal is spending a fortune on food subsidies for employees.

"The food subsidy bill must be brought before the committee to allow Parliament to comprehensively scrutinise if such expenditure is warranted," DA MP Natasha Mazzone said in a statement.

"The portfolio committee must perform its constitutionally mandated oversight role in the best interests of all South Africans."

Mazzone said she would write to the chairperson of the public enterprises committee asking that acting finance director Nonkululeko Veleti be summoned to Parliament to explain.

The Sunday Times reported that about 17 000 people, or 37% of all Eskom staff, had access to dining facilities and canteens that provided subsidised meals.

In addition, contractors building the new Medupi and Kusile power stations were getting hot meals at an additional cost estimated to exceed R1.5bn.

This emerged while the power utility was facing financial difficulties and power generation problems.

According to Sunday Times, despite the financial crisis Eskom's catering contracts continued to be issued. The subsidies ranged from 50% to 80% per meal.

Eskom spokesperson Khulu Phasiwe told the paper that Eskom's operational and capital expenditure was under scrutiny to find ways to cut costs.

Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown said it was an operational matter which Eskom was better placed to respond to.

Mazzone said the fact that Brown and Eskom's management had failed to answer questions regarding the catering was "an insult in the context of regular load shedding".

"Eskom should be ensuring that all operational expenditure is aimed at addressing load shedding and completing Medupi and Kusile without any further delay.

"Expenditure that is not operationally imperative, at this time in Eskom’s history, is a blatant extravagance and a slap in the face for South Africans who have been asked to tighten their belts."

Read more on:    eskom  |  lynne brown

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.