DA condemns Zuma's letter to Madonsela

2014-09-12 17:30
(File, City Press)

(File, City Press)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - The DA on Friday condemned President Jacob Zuma's letter to the Public Protector in which he disagrees with Thuli Madonsela's view that her reports and recommendations can only be reviewed by a court of law.

"The letter attempts to redefine the scope of the Office of the Public Protector, in direct violation of the Constitution," Democratic Alliance parliamentary leader Mmusi Maimane said in a statement.

"The Constitution is clear that only a court of law can review the outcomes of Chapter Nine institutions, which according to Section 181(2) of the Constitution 'are independent, and subject to the Constitution and the law'."

Maimane accused Zuma of misreading the Constitution.

"It is extremely worrying that the president has chosen to misrepresent the Constitution and the work of the Public Protector," Maimane said.

"In so doing, he has created the incorrect impression that compliance with remedial action taken by the Public Protector is optional."

Deferred decision

In his letter to Madonsela, Zuma said the Public Protector had arrived at her findings without the "adversarial hearing" inherent in a court process and that this was a "significant factor to caution me against a blanket acceptance without applying my own mind".

Therefore, his role was not simply to rubber stamp her findings.

The president has faced sustained criticism for not complying with Madonsela's order that he reimburse the state for improvements, such as a swimming pool and chicken run, to his homestead in Nkandla as part of a project originally meant to upgrade security.

The president last month deferred a decision on whether he was liable to repay any funds to Police Minister Nathi Nhleko.

Zuma said in his letter that he stood by this decision.

The Special Investigating Unit tabled its report on the upgrades in Parliament on Friday.

Like Madonsela, it found that Zuma was enriched by state-funded improvements to his Nkandla home.

But unlike the Public Protector, who found Zuma was liable to pay a portion of the cost, the SIU concluded that the best way of recovering R155m misspent at Nkandla was to claim it from his architect Minenhle Makhanya.

Public concern

In its report, the SIU placed the blame for the project ballooning into "unacceptable extravagance" on Makhanya.

It said its eight-month investigation showed that, through Makhanya's doing, the state suffered massive losses and many people were enriched, including Zuma and his family in the sense that the value of their home was enhanced.

"Makhanya inter alia increased the scope and extent of the works by designing and authorising items that were not required for security purposes," the SIU said in the report.

As a result of this, the cost of the project "soared from an initial estimate of some R27m to some R216m".

By any standard this was a large sum of money and the public concern was "understandable".

The unit said it faced a choice of claiming the damages and losses suffered by the department of public works from an array of people who were enriched, or to seek to recover the full amount from Makhanya himself.

"We chose the latter option," it said.

The SIU filed a civil claim for R155.3m against Makhanya in the KwaZulu-Natal High Court on 11 August.

He has hired high profile lawyers to contest the matter.

Read more on:    siu  |  jacob zuma  |  nathi nhleko  |  mmusi maimane  |  thuli madonsela  |  cape town  |  nkandla upgrade

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Competition regulation for a growing and inclusive economy

ADVERTORIAL: The Competition Commission of South Africa is conducting advocacy work in the South African automotive aftermarket industry and has gazetted a Draft Code of Conduct for public comment.

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.