Info bill sent back to committee

2013-10-22 18:34
(Picture: Sapa)

(Picture: Sapa)

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Cape Town - The National Assembly has referred the protection of state information bill back to the ad hoc committee that drafted and recently reviewed it, because it had failed to observe procedural rules.

The step was prompted on Tuesday by an appeal by IFP MP Mario Oriani-Ambrosini to the speaker, noting that the committee had failed to properly include minority views and full minutes of its proceedings.

It leaves room only for these matters to be corrected and not for further amendments to the official secrets bill.

"There were procedural issues that needed to be addressed, and the only way to do that is to introduce a new committee in terms of the rules of Parliament, as the old committee had ceased to exist," said Moloto Mothapo, the spokesperson for the office of the ANC chief whip.

"It was referred back to the committee on technical grounds to ensure the report is adjusted in line with the rules of Parliament. It had to take into consideration all the work that all the previous committees did."

The legislature agreed to reconstitute the committee and to give it until 7 November to report back on its work.

Limited changes

A fortnight ago, the ANC majority on the committee pushed through limited changes to the official secrets bill, overruling objections from other parties that the process was flawed.

This resulted in corrections to two technical errors in two sections of the bill that were singled out by President Jacob Zuma when he sent it back to Parliament in September.

All opposition parties abstained from the vote, arguing that although the changes were welcome, Zuma had fallen foul of the Constitution by failing to give MPs an exact brief.

At issue was whether Zuma had intended MPs to confine their review to sections 42 and 45, or whether he had intended them to interrogate other, unnamed, sections of the bill when he raised reservations of constitutionality and referred it back to the legislature.

The opposition wrote to the president to seek clarity, but he did not respond.

In the end, chief state law adviser Enver Daniels ruled that the review had to be confined to the two sections explicitly mentioned by Zuma, dashing activists' hopes for a comprehensive review of arguably the most bitterly contested piece of post-apartheid legislation.

MPs fixed an incorrect cross-reference in section 42 and a punctuation error in section 45 that in effect rendered meaningless a hard-won safeguard on the state's powers to classify information.


After the vote, ANC hardliners tried to block a demand from the DA, the Cope, and the IFP that their reasons for objecting be included in full in the committee's report to the National Assembly.

ANC MP Jerome Maake said the committee had already indulged the opposition sufficiently by hearing their arguments.

Committee chair Cecil Burgess finally allowed a terse reference to the opposition's objections to be noted in the committee report.

African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) MP Steve Swart said the appeal to the speaker was mainly prompted by the opposition's position that they had the right to have their arguments on the president's referral included in the report in full.

"The main point relates to the inclusion of a minority report as to why the opposition parties abstained from the vote. We wanted to explain why we objected to the process."

Opponents of the bill said that although the bill underwent many changes during three years of drafting, it still raises the spectre of excessive state secrecy and will not pass constitutional muster on many grounds.

Read more on:    cope  |  anc  |  acdp  |  ifp  |  jacob zuma  |  mario oriani-ambrosini  |  cape town  |  parliament 2013  |  info bill

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.
NEXT ON NEWS24X publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Competition regulation for a growing and inclusive economy

ADVERTORIAL: The Competition Commission of South Africa is conducting advocacy work in the South African automotive aftermarket industry and has gazetted a Draft Code of Conduct for public comment.

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.