96 hours and no word from IRB

Cape Town - It's been four days now since the twin referee debacles in last weekend's Rugby Championship Tests - but it's been radio silence from the IRB...

France's Pascal Gauzère drew the anger of both All Blacks and Argentina fans for a number of crucial calls, in particular his failure to penalise a blatant, early hold on Julian Savea in a try-scoring position and a perfectly legitimate charge down "try" by the visitors at a crucial stage in the second half.

Ireland's George Clancy then became persona non grata - similar to how die-hard Boks fans view referees Bryce Lawrence, Stuart Dickinson and Romain Poite - with a series of clangers which all had some degree of impact in ensuring the Boks went down by a single point in Perth.

While referees in the recent past - think Jaco Peyper and Craig Joubert - have held up their hands in admitting to blunders in matches, the IRB, Gauzère and Clancy have all been tjoepstil some 96 hours after the fact.

One expected at the very least for the IRB to issue a statement reminding irate fans of law 17.c, subsections 4, 7, 12 and 19d which states the "referee is always correct" - but not even that!

Has rugby become impossible to referee by a single person? Is it time to go ahead with the two-referee system as implemented at Varsity Cup level this season?

And what about the Assistant Referees? Do they have a free ride on the sidelines, failing to see what's important and potentially result-defining, instead only seemingly ever content to grind a match to a halt with a flag to report an innocuous "hand bags" scuffle?

And the TMO? Sitting in the luxury of a sound-proof booth with access to replay after replay, how does he get it wrong so often?

Rugby is in trouble. Big trouble.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24
loading... Live
India 325/10 & 69/0
New Zealand 62/10
Voting Booth
What are your views on the World Rugby men's Player of the Year nominations for 2021 not including any Springboks?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It's a disgrace! Both Siya Kolisi AND Eben Etzebeth should have been nominated!
39% - 5542 votes
Siya, at the very least, should have been included after a superb season
7% - 936 votes
Etzebeth has been SA's best player this year and should feel hard done by
20% - 2886 votes
Get over it! Moaning about this just sounds like sour grapes!
34% - 4724 votes
Vote