RMI: 'Toll process unacceptable'

2011-07-04 10:16
NOT GOOD ENOUGH: While the RMI welcomed  the proposed reduced rates for the system of e-tolls rolled out across the Gauteng province, it said the decision-making process is flawed.

NOT GOOD ENOUGH: While the RMI welcomed the proposed reduced rates for the system of e-tolls rolled out across the Gauteng province, it said the decision-making process is flawed.

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

The Retail Motor Industry has hit out at the process by which the proposed e-toll tariffs were presented.

The revised rates for the controversial e-tolling system for Gauteng’s Freeway Improvement Project were announced on Thursday, June 30. However, these proposed rates were submitted to the transport and finance ministers, and the premier of Gauteng, for final review.

The transport department’s director general and the chairperson of the steering committee of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project, George Mahlalela, said the process would now be steered through cabinet by the national transport minister, Sibusiso Ndebele.


RMI CEO Jeff Osborne said:  “Stakeholders were limited to information-sharing instead of participation.”

Osborne added that the rates were decided before a task group was allowed to provide its input and said points raised by the majority of stakeholders had not been taken on board. He also said that an embargo on access to many of the input studies mentioned in the report prevented stakeholders from seeing how their input was interpreted.

No stakeholders except those in the government were invited to join the steering committee and its report did not address the complexity of the tariff structures, Osborne added.


Osborne also said the revised tariffs fall short of stakeholders’ expectations and there was insufficient information about possible changes to the off-peak and frequent-user discounts. He was in favour of an across-the-board toll of 10c/km, questioning whether the steering committee understood how such a steep additional cost would affect people.

“They (commuters) already have electricity hikes, and increases in rates and taxes to contend with. With these revisions, the poor will become poorer,” Osborne lamented.

There are other methods of raising the funds, Osborne said, and noted that most stakeholders favoured a ring-fenced fuel levy as the better option.

Join the conversation!

24.com encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.