Brics summit says talk is best

2012-03-29 22:46

New Delhi - The world's emerging powers on Thursday said dialogue was the only answer to crises in Syria and Iran at a summit aimed at bolstering their non-Western alliance's influence on global affairs.

The Brics - South Africa, Brazil, Russia, India and China - made several criticisms of the rich world, including over reform at the IMF, and launched plans for their first joint institution, a development bank.

At their fourth summit together, leaders from the five members also issued a pre-emptive warning against any military action by the West or Israel to end the unrest in Syria or the dispute over Iran's nuclear programme.

"We agreed that a lasting solution in Syria and Iran can only be found through dialogue," Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said in a closing statement at the one-day summit in New Delhi.

A summit declaration warned of the "disastrous consequences" of allowing the Iran stand-off to escalate into conflict and stressed that the bloodshed in Syria could only be resolved by "peaceful means".

Much of the final statement at the conclusion of the one-day meeting dwelt on how the Brics alliance would co-ordinate their positions together while lobbying collectively to grab a greater say in world affairs.

"In the future the Brics agenda will be a step-by-step transformation of this forum into a strong and powerful organisation," Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said.

Though it remains in the planning stages, the newly proposed Brics development bank is an attempt to cement the countries together.

Brics finance ministers will examine the "feasibility and viability" of the proposal and report back before the grouping's next summit, in South Africa in 2013.


South African President Jacob Zuma said the bank would fund infrastructure and was an idea welcomed by other leaders on his continent. "Such a bank has great potential to help us create good jobs," he said.

Two other agreements were signed aimed at simplifying credit facilities for exporters and increasing the use of each others' currencies - and not the US dollar - in trade deals.

The leaders also pushed for the reform of international financial and economic institutions - a cornerstone of the Brics agenda - and criticised the "slow pace" of reforms at the International Monetary Fund.

But there was no common ground on who should become the new president of the World Bank, the IMF's sister organisation.

They said they "welcome the candidatures from the developing world" for the new head of the Washington-based body - to be announced by April - but they did not throw their weight behind either of them.

Colombian university professor Jose Antonio Ocampo and Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala are attempting to break the US monopoly on the position.

This lack of unity, says critics, underlines the problems of the bloc, which brings together five geographically dispersed countries with different political systems, economies and priorities.

Walter Ladwig from the British think-tank the Royal United Services Institute wrote recently that they "have little in common" and will shape global governance in the future only as "individual nations".

"Brics countries have different national conditions and development models," Chinese President Hu Jintao conceded. "We should see the differences as an opportunity to draw on each others' strengths."

Their strengths currently lie in their booming economies, which have largely withstood the problems in the rich world stemming from the 2008 crisis in the US banking sector.

The policies introduced by Europe and Washington since - zero interest rates and repeated cash infusions into the banking sector - are a cause of concern for emerging markets.

"Excessive liquidity from the aggressive policy actions taken by central banks to stabilise their domestic economies have been spilling over into emerging market economies," the declaration said.

An excess of cash flowing from the rich world into emerging markets can cause asset bubbles and result in volatile changes in exchange rates.

Alongside the statements on the need for dialogue in Syria and Iran, the Brics also voiced their support for a Syrian peace process promoted by international envoy Kofi Annan.

Russia and China - which both wield vetoes on the UN Security Council - have stridently opposed using force or outside intervention to resolve the Syrian crisis or defuse Iran's nuclear drive.

The United States and its allies have been frustrated by a Sino-Russian veto in the Security Council on condemning Syria in stronger terms.

  • Africa21stcentury - 2012-03-30 02:38

    Before talk,what would be best, if Russsia stops supplying Syria with military hardware!!! Just in 2011, more than one BILLION US $ ,to one of the most repressive regimes in the world.

      Fidel - 2012-03-30 10:47

      In this era of 'money is God', the human rights debate can wait until western powers can unashamedly examine their own records. The Americans too have plenty of work to do at home, and hopefully will clean up their own act before too much more meddling in the affairs of others. Obama's administration have recently signed a $30bn arms deal with Saudi Arabia, are still shipping arms to Bahrain. Facts, facts and more facts..........

      Africa21stcentury - 2012-03-30 12:29

      In the last 12 months, how many American weapons have been found in Syria ??????.....NILL. Stop , confusing the issue !!!!

  • Fred - 2012-03-30 06:12

    Between Russia, China and South Africa, human rights is not a strong suit of BRICS, South Africa because of its totally impotent and ineffective handling of Zimbabwe.

      Fidel - 2012-03-30 10:48

      When it comes to human rights, western powers merely export their excesses abroad!

  • Nigel - 2012-03-30 08:40

    Russia & China's veto & their support for Iran is all about money, not principle, Russia is directly involved with Irans Nuclear program, so they are prioritizing their business interests at the expense of world peace, its no wonder the ANC Govt & Russia are getting along, their selfish interests come before principles & the greater good of mankind, the only difference is that the Russians actually care about their own people, unlike the ANC.

      Fidel - 2012-03-30 10:53

      Greater good of mankind, what balooney! Have western powers engaged the developing world for the benefit of mankind. Look at GATT, and WTO directives to realise who has been working to benefit who.

  • pages:
  • 1