DNA frees innocent man after 30 years

2011-01-04 08:24

Dallas - Prosecutors declared a Texas man innocent on Monday of a rape and robbery that put him in prison for 30 years, more than any other exonerated by DNA in the state.

DNA test results that came back barely a week after Cornelius Dupree jnr was paroled in July excluded him as the person who attacked a Dallas woman in 1979, prosecutors said on Monday. Dupree was just 20 when he was sentenced to 75 years in prison in 1980.

Now 51, he has spent more time wrongly imprisoned than any other prisoner exonerated by DNA in Texas, which has freed 41 wrongly convicted inmates through DNA since 2001 - more than any other state.

"Our Conviction Integrity Unit thoroughly reinvestigated this case, tested the biological evidence and based on the results, concluded Cornelius Dupree did not commit this crime," Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins said.

Dupree is expected to have his aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon conviction overturned on Tuesday at an exoneration hearing in a Dallas court.

Wrongly convicted

There have been 21 DNA exonerations in Dallas since 2001, more than any other county in the nation. Only two states - Illinois and New York - have freed more of the wrongly convicted through DNA evidence, according to the Innocence Project, a New York-based legal centre representing Dupree that specialises in wrongful conviction cases.

Dupree's 30 years in prison will surpass James Woodard, who spent more than 27 years imprisoned for a murder that he was cleared of in 2008.

Dallas' record of DNA exonerations is unmatched nationally because the county crime lab maintains biological evidence even decades after a conviction, leaving samples available to test.

In addition, Watkins has co-operated with innocence groups in reviewing hundreds of requests by inmates for DNA testing. Watkins, the first black DA in Texas history, has also pointed to what he calls "a convict-at-all-costs mentality" that he said permeated the DA's office before he arrived in 2007.

The DNA testing also excluded a second defendant, Anthony Massingill, who was subsequently convicted in another sexual assault case and sentenced to life in prison. Massingill remains in prison but maintains his innocence. DNA testing in that second case is ongoing.

Dupree was charged in 1979 with raping and robbing a 26-year-old woman and sentenced in 1980 to 75 years in prison for aggravated robbery. He was never tried on the rape charge.

According to court documents, the woman and her male companion stopped at a Dallas liquor store in November 1979 to buy cigarettes and use a payphone. As they returned to their car, two men, at least one of whom was armed, forced their way into the vehicle and ordered them to drive. They also demanded money from the two victims.


The men eventually ordered the car to the side of the road and forced the male driver out of the car. The woman attempted to flee but was pulled back inside. The perpetrators drove the woman to a nearby park, where they raped her at gunpoint.

They debated killing her but eventually let her live, keeping her rabbit-fur coat and her driver's licence and warning her they would kill her if she reported the assault to police. The victim ran to the nearest highway and collapsed unconscious by the side of the road, where she was discovered.

About five days later, two men whose descriptions did not match Dupree tried to sell the rabbit-fur coat at a grocery store about 3km from the liquor store, according to court documents. The car stolen from the victims was found abandoned in the parking lot.

Dupree and Massingill were arrested in December because they looked similar to two suspects being sought in another sexual assault and robbery. The 26-year-old woman picked both men out of a photo array, but her male companion did not identify either defendant in the same photo array.

Dupree was convicted and spent the next three decades appealing. The Court of Criminal Appeals turned him down three times.

The Innocence Project, which took on his case in 2006, obtained DNA testing last year on biological evidence taken from a vaginal swab. In July, shortly after Dupree's release, the test results cleared Dupree and Massingill.

The hearing is happening now because authorities needed additional testing to confirm that the 30-year-old biological material was a DNA match to the victim.

  • lmduplessis - 2011-01-04 08:46

    Well that sucks. Poor guy. But now what?

      rmarkram - 2011-01-04 09:09

      He will sue the f# out of them

      Joe_Public - 2011-01-04 10:36

      Yeah. It's the US. He will sue them for trauma, wrongful incarceration, loss of income. Basically they've stuffed up his life for no reason at all. Sadly he can't buy time and 30 years is a lot of it. He deserves to have carte blanche on everything for the rest of his life - all paid for by the state.

      Joe - 2011-01-04 14:16

      No he won't be able to sue them just randomly. They will present a bargain: so much dollars per year, and that's it. He'll WILL however be rich forever.

  • WTF-Man? - 2011-01-04 08:53

    Hope he sues the s**t out of them!

  • Andrew - 2011-01-04 09:00

    And people still think we should bring back the death penalty.....

      Joe_Public - 2011-01-04 10:33

      Exactly. Morons. We just need better police and more prisons.

      mark.nieuwoudt - 2011-01-05 10:15

      Wait until someone rapes and kills your mother/wife/daughter, and then tell me the death penalty must not be brought back.

  • Zennie - 2011-01-04 09:01

    If this can happen thru a jury,what cannot happen if only a magistrate or judge heard the case. I believe many innocent people are behind bars and many culprits walk freely around.

  • jnrb71 - 2011-01-04 09:04

    So much for the American jury system and the "just find me a bad guy- doesn't matter who it is" mentality. Locally I hope Fred vd Vyfer sues teh pants off them!

  • Nice Guy - 2011-01-04 09:07

    Oh well. At least he had 30 years to meditate on the Traquil Wheel of Life. He should have levitated out of prison with so much practice. Quite frankly he was plled out cos he was a trouble causer. At least the world had 30 years of freedom from his raping in other cases

      MP3 - 2011-01-04 11:42

      You're a f**king idiot. He was wrongly convicted. Meaning he did not rape that woman. "At least the world had 30 years of freedom from his raping in other cases" Seriously? Idiot...

      POLS_G - 2011-01-04 13:43

      And you call yourself a 'nive guy', huh???? Learn to think before invoking such flattery, moron.

      Mucaine - 2011-01-04 13:52

      That’s why they have innocent people sentenced to death and imprisoned for life, because they have idiots like you on the jury. Put yourself in his shoes you stupid pr*ck!

  • Tieneke - 2011-01-04 11:42

    Great news, just a pity a good mans life has wasted away in a jail. Good luck to him and his family.

  • Cistas - 2011-01-04 13:52

    Poor guy. Spent all this time in jail for something he didn't do. Well he must sue them for loss of income. He might have been the President of the USA,who knows, but they deprived him that

  • Limpopoist - 2011-01-04 14:09

    Ooh poor guy,He missed a lot during his 20s age group,especially cheating and changing gils like underwares,IF suing state does not work,commit crime as you already served your term

      What - 2011-01-05 08:55

      No need to commit any crimes, He must give himself back to prison for another 30 years, not only that he is used to that life but he must give the second cheek for smootching as well. Afterall he can't start afresh he missed a lot. I feel sorry for him.

  • Barrydegreat - 2011-01-05 11:21

    Shame I feel it for Him. I wonder how many others over the centuries were wrongly executed

  • pages:
  • 1