Gay marriage push in Australia

2012-02-13 08:56

Sydney - Two bills calling for the legalisation of gay marriage were introduced to Australia's parliament on Monday in a move campaigners said would add momentum to the push for equality.

The private member's bills, introduced by left-leaning Greens lawmaker Adam Bandt and Stephen Jones from the ruling Labour party, take to three the pieces of legislation now before the parliament calling for gay marriage rights.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young brought a similar bill in the upper house in September 2010 which is now being examined by a legislative inquiry.

None of the bills have enough support to pass into law but rights campaigners said their introduction, which follows Labour's reversal of its official policy to pro-gay marriage in December, showed the tide was turning.

"The Jones bill demonstrates the immense momentum behind reform," said Alex Greenwich, convenor of the Australian Marriage Equality lobby group.

"Three months ago the Labour Party was officially opposed to reform and now we have a Labour member leading the way towards equality."

He described Monday's events as a "milestone on the road to equality".

Equal rights

Greenwich said rights advocates wanted both Jones and Bandt's bills to be examined by the Senate committee looking into Hanson-Young's bill so that "the best possible legislation can be developed and put forward".

Jones said there would not be a debate or vote for some months yet.

In Australia marriage is mandated by federal legislation, so although civil same-sex unions are recognised in five states, the couples are not seen as "married" by the federal government.

All the same, same-sex couples have equal rights with heterosexual couples in areas such as pension schemes and medical benefits.

Until December there had been bipartisan opposition to same-sex marriage in Australia and though Labour's official platform has changed, the party agreed to vote on conscience rather than in bloc, meaning there is presently little prospect of legal change.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard opposes gay marriage, and the conservative Liberal-National coalition has made clear that its members will be expected to uphold the current heterosexual definition of marriage if a vote is called.

"Our position is clear. We believe that a marriage is between a man and a woman and that's the way the Coalition will be voting," said Liberal frontbencher Joe Hockey.

  • Andre - 2012-02-13 09:33

    "Our position is clear. We believe that a marriage is between a man and a woman and that's the way the Coalition will be voting," said Liberal frontbencher Joe Hockey - halleluja!! Two of the same cannot procasternate as YAHW commanded. No argument here.

      Phoenix - 2012-02-13 09:37

      I think you mean procreate. So basically you are saying hetero couples who cannot have children should not be able to get married? Your religious views are totally irrelevant in this situation. There is a seperation of state and religion for a reason. Who are you to tell two people in a loving relationship that they are not allowed to get married? Fortunately sane-thinking people around the world are realising the importance of allowing people of opposite and same gender to marry.

      Godfrey - 2012-02-13 10:39

      @Andre There is no difference between the current homophobes and the christian racist bigots who supported slavery 150 years ago and Apartheid more recently. Christian racists now wish to apply the same discrimination against homosexuals and other people who differ from them. The bigotry and cruelty is identical. Perhaps you protesteth too much. In what way does the fact that two people of a different sexual persuasion to you affect your life or relationships? Seems to me the most rabid religious homophobes are closet homosexuals themselves. lift my luggage Pastor Rekers

  • pages:
  • 1