McCain backs Mitt Romney

2012-01-05 08:10

Peterborough - Mitt Romney took fresh fire on Wednesday from his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination, but also nabbed an endorsement from top Senator John McCain as the 2012 campaign moved to New Hampshire.

McCain, who beat Romney for the party's 2008 nod but fell to President Barack Obama, told voters here that they had a chance to help the former Massachusetts governor virtually wrap up the nominating fight in their January 10 primary.

A big win here would give Romney's campaign "such momentum that it cannot be stopped", then carry the candidate through South Carolina's January 21 primary and "get this thing over with, get the real contest going", the Arizona lawmaker declared.

Romney, who enjoys a vast lead in New Hampshire, was to head to South Carolina on Thursday to campaign with McCain and Nikki Haley, the state's first woman governor and just the second Indian-American US state governor ever.

"This president we have now is over his head when guiding this country," said Romney, who was invigorated after winning Iowa's nominating caucus by a whisker. "I'll go to work getting Americans back to work."

But Romney still faced a fierce battle with his more conservative rivals for the right to take on Obama in the November 6 elections - like former senator and Christian conservative Rick Santorum, whom he bested in Iowa by just eight votes out of more than 120 000 cast.

Down and dirty

He will also face former House speaker Newt Gingrich, who blamed attack ads by Romney and surrogates for his fourth-place finish in Iowa. Gingrich aimed to put up TV ads attacking Romney in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida.

At a stop in Laconia, New Hampshire, Gingrich questioned Romney's conservative credentials, calling him out of step with Republican icon Ronald Reagan and charging he "accommodated liberalism" as governor.

"Only an effective, articulate conservative can defeat Barack Obama," said Gingrich, who called it "silly" to say that the more centrist Romney would be more electable.

Gingrich was in third place in New Hampshire, with 9% support among likely voters in the Republican primary, according to a two-day tracking poll by Suffolk University/7News.

Romney led with 43% support, followed by veteran Texas congressman Ron Paul with 14%. Former US China envoy Jon Huntsman, who skipped Iowa and place his hopes on a strong finish here, was at 7%.

Asked on CNN television whether he would campaign "down and dirty" against Romney if needed, Huntsman replied: "That's the way the game is played here in New Hampshire and beyond. The stakes are too high."

Only 16% of likely Republican primary voters said they are undecided - a lower number than in the final days before the Iowa caucus, when roughly half said they had yet to make up their minds.

Asked whether Romney would win, Paul candidly told CNN that "odds makers would probably bet that" - but pointed to Santorum's late surge in Iowa as evidence that "you can change things rather quickly right at the end."

Huge political weight

"I think all of us will continue to campaign very hard there," said Paul, a small-government advocate who opposes foreign aid and overseas military interventions.

Iowa cemented Romney's status as the frontrunner for the Republican nomination among the remaining six candidates, but failed to dispel lingering doubts about his popularity among the party's traditional conservative base.

McCain, who carries huge political weight, remains popular in New Hampshire, where he beat Romney 37%-31% four years ago.

"It's a plus. I voted for him in the last election. I like them both, they are men with good values and that’s what I want to lead this nation in the right direction," retired health worker Pat Voute, 68, told AFP.

McCain's backing for Romney reflected an effort by the Republican establishment to avoid an intra-party bloodletting that could leave the eventual nominee in a weakened position to take on Obama.

The first casualty of Tuesday's vote was Representative Michele Bachmann, who announced she was quitting the race after her disappointing sixth place finish in the heartland state where she was born.

At the event here, Norma Lesser said she had settled on a candidate but that the campaign was "a fluid situation."

"There's another week and a lot of skeletons can still come out of the closet," said Lesser, who once worked in television, screening candidates for popular game shows like "Sale of the Century".

  • George - 2012-01-05 12:51

    Dumb backing dumber, is this the best the US has??? Perhaps we should send Julias over there because the Americans know nothing about polotiks.

      Graziella - 2012-01-05 14:17

      Americans are historically and politically illiterate. One way or another, Americans believe! There are two broad camps at this time: those who fear the encroachment of government, and those who are idiots who don't fear it and love the president. In the US, there is no government representative of the people - they have only government co-opted by corporations. So, the President, per se, and his party, per se, are completely irrelevant. Only the American people don't know this. There is no one to vote for that equals a real change of any substance. There is no party that is an anti-war party for example. The Democrats are deceivers. The Republicans are liars.

  • Graziella - 2012-01-05 14:23

    The American people are like a terribly mentally disabled child. The "history" and "politics" that they learned in school is no more than a cartoon. They do not perceive the steel thread of policy that has governed them for 100 years irrespective of the surface chop of the noisy political "debate." They have not read Noam Chomsky -- those who have are in the outside margins. So there is a criminal enterprise at work - involving both parties, whose objective is the enslavement and destruction of the society at large: Enslavement to consign Americans to producing their (Rich) wealth, and death to those who resist.

  • pages:
  • 1