Mom spared jail in son's jaywalking death

2011-07-27 14:00

Marietta - A woman who was arrested after her 4-year-old son was struck and killed by a van as they were jaywalking across a busy street was spared a prison sentence on Tuesday following an outcry over her arrest.

Raquel Nelson, aged 30, was convicted by a jury earlier this month of vehicular homicide and other charges for not using a crosswalk and could have gotten three years behind bars - far more than the six months the hit-and-run driver served.

Instead, without explanation, Judge Kathryn Tanksley gave the suburban Atlanta mother a year's probation, ordered 40 hours of community service, and took the unusual step of offering her a new trial. Nelson's lawyer said late on Tuesday that she will take the judge up on the offer.

A crowd of supporters broke out in applause.

"I'm ready to go home," a relieved-looking Nelson said. "I'm walking out of here. I don't feel like I can be more satisfied."

Prosecutors' extremely rare decision to bring charges against the grieving mother had created a furore, with Nelson's supporters calling the move cruel and heartless.

Mother also hit

More than 125 000 people joined an online petition campaign asking for mercy. The Georgia branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People, a leading civil rights group, called the case against the single black mother a "grave miscarriage of justice". And the judge said her office had been flooded with letters and e-mails from around the country.

The accident happened in April 2010 along a busy five-lane street.

Nelson and her three children had just gotten off a bus after a long day, and she was eager to return home because it was getting dark, said her lawyer, David Savoy. Instead of walking to a crosswalk a half a kilometre away, she led her children to a median. According to testimony, her daughter darted across the street and son AJ followed and was hit and killed.

She chased after them and was struck and injured.

The driver, Jerry Guy, pleaded guilty to hit-and-run. According to court records, he had been drinking earlier in the day while taking pain medication, was partially blind in one eye, and had two previous hit-and-run convictions from 1997.

As for the decision to charge Nelson, too, "these cases are inherently difficult because they are unintentional", prosecutor Annamarie Baltz explained. "But the state is bound to uphold the law."

Slap in the face

Nevertheless, Baltz asked for probation for Nelson and said prosecutors never intended to send her to prison.

In an appearance on NBC television's Today show on Monday, Nelson said: "I think to come after me so much harder than they did after him is a slap in the face. This will never end for me."

Savoy argued that his client has already suffered enough for her mistake. He said prosecutors would never charge a parent who accidentally left open a pool gate if a child drowned, or a parent who fed a hot dog to a youngster who choked on it.

"Do not make AJ's death an act that washes over this family like a tidal wave," he said. "There's no legitimate basis to make this family continue to suffer."

Inside the courthouse, Nelson's supporters gathered in the halls for a prayer vigil and urged the judge not to punish her any further.

"Every day she gets up, she pays her debt," said Beverly Ward, who was AJ's preschool teacher.

A cruel waste

Advocates seized on the case as evidence that the car-choked Atlanta metropolitan area needs better crosswalks.

"It's really cruel and a big waste of taxpayer money" to prosecute Nelson, said Sally Flocks, founder of Peds, an Atlanta pedestrian advocacy group. "What is anybody going to learn from this? Raquel lost her precious son. The lesson she learned already is quit using transit and buy a car to get around. It's too dangerous to cross the streets here."

The case has been the talk of Georgia legal circles.

J Tom Morgan, a former DeKalb County district attorney who specialised in the prosecution of crimes against children, said he was surprised prosecutors targeted Nelson.

"She wasn't out drinking," he said. "In a case like this where the mother suffered the tragic loss of a child, and there's no gross negligence, I wouldn't have involved the criminal justice system."

And W Scott Smith, a defence attorney, said he has never heard of a similar prosecution in his 11 years in practice.

"It's one of those things that if you're the state, you've got to use common sense. The person is going to live with themselves the rest of their lives," he said.

  • frangelico - 2011-07-27 15:46

    Sometimes justice fails us.Am glad she wasn't jailed,she is clearly not a criminal.In her situation I (we) would have done the same.

  • zeekoevlei - 2011-07-27 16:10

    What gets me the most annoyed is seeing parents of, in some cases, babies and toddlers, allowing them to sit/stand/jump/play unrestrained in vehicles. Do they not realise the dangers of even the slightest accident, or even just having to simply break suddenly? So many children are brain-damaged, hurt and maimed each year because of reckless and negligent behaviour of the people that are meant to protect them. If you can afford a car, you can afford a child-restraint, it's as simple as that. If you have your little one transported to and from school by others, make sure they are adequately and safely protected in that vehicle.

  • Bus Girl - 2011-08-01 20:01

    It's entrapment. The city specifically designs the layout of the bus stops with the intention of crossing the street, and then charges her with a crime when she does. Just another way to keep the underprivileged down where they belong.

  • Lorna Murdoch-Eaton - 2014-01-01 09:44

    Absolutely right that this lady was offered a new trial. She has paid dreadfully for her mistake. However the hit-and-run driver is another matter. He is clearly unfit to be behind the wheel. Has done the same thing TWICE before (hit and run), he irresponsibly takes medication and drinks when he is due to drive and has vision problems... yet he gets a mere 6 months in jail? That is appalling!

  • pages:
  • 1