No-show Putin sets sour tone?

2012-05-12 11:01

Washington - Among Vladimir Putin's first acts now that he's back in Russia's top job was to cancel a date with President Barack Obama.

Both nations insist Putin's no-show at a high-profile economic gathering tailored for his attendance is not a snub. But the decision to skip next week's meeting of the Group of Eight industrial nations in the US and a much-anticipated Oval Office meeting with Obama, may set a sour tone for the next four years.

If Obama wins re-election, he will have Putin as a sometime partner and sometime adversary through the end of his presidency. If Republican Mitt Romney wins, the dynamic might be very different. Romney has called Russia an "enemy," while Putin has signaled that he will hold off on any major new cooperation with the United States until he knows who will be president.

Either way, Russia watchers in and out of the US government predict a more businesslike relationship than was the case under his predecessor, Dmitry Medvedev, and perhaps a more limited one. Putin has a variety of troubles at home and is not likely to pick a fight with the United States despite sharply negative rhetoric about Washington during his election campaign. But he also is not likely to welcome friendly ties for their own sake, said Steven Pifer, a Russia and arms control expert at the Brookings Institution.

"I think you'll see a more transactional relationship," Pifer said.

Putin will be prepared to cooperate with the U.S. where he sees fit, "but it will be, 'If I do this for you, what do I get?'" Pifer said.

Putin returned on Monday to the presidency he had vacated four years earlier. The Russian constitution prohibits more than two consecutive terms. In the interim, Putin protege Medvedev was president and Putin occupied the previously less important post of prime minister. Medvedev made way for Putin's return, and now Putin has installed Medvedev as prime minister.

Putin was considered the top decision-maker throughout, but Medvedev brought a cheerier and more Western-oriented face to Russian leadership that Obama sought to engage.

The White House quietly announced this week that Putin would not attend the G-8 meeting as planned and would send Medvedev instead. That followed another surprising announcement from the White House earlier this year, when it abruptly said the G-8 meeting was being moved from its long-planned Chicago venue to Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland's Catoctin Mountains north of Washington.

A major reason for the switch was to appear welcoming to Putin, U.S. and other diplomats said. The economic meeting was planned to take place adjacent to a summit of Nato leaders in Chicago, and Putin's fierce opposition to a planned Nato missile defense shield in Europe made his attendance at even half the planned gathering awkward.

The Kremlin explained on Thursday Putin's decision to skip the high-profile visit to the US by saying he needs to finish setting up his new government. That sounded hollow to many US ears but makes some sense given Putin's political troubles at home.

"It does not at all feel like a snub," White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday. "It was something we understood."

Putin's job swap with Medvedev, the former president who is now prime minister, has created tensions of its own within Russia's ruling elite. Who will serve in the new Cabinet under Medvedev and what role will be played by other top Putin allies who object to being subordinate to Medvedev? No appointments have yet been made.

Associated Press writer Lynn Berry in Moscow contributed to this report.

  • Chaapo - 2012-05-12 15:24

    It isnot just US politics but the fact that he also wnats to consolidate his position in the face of unrelenting dissent. His presidency is tainted with reports of unbridled corruption in order for him to win.

      fred.fraser.12 - 2012-05-12 15:55

      Yes. The official result was 64:36 in his favor. Not a single exit poll conducted by the international observer mission verified this. Some polls that they conducted reflected a 50:50 position. They concluded that it wasn't that hard to conduct free and fair elections. Putin didn't.

  • pages:
  • 1