Progress to Iran nuclear talks hampered

2013-02-05 17:41

Dubai - Iran and world powers announced new talks on Tehran's nuclear programme on 26 February, but hopes of progress after Tuesday's announcement were tempered when an Iranian official said the West's goal in talking was to undermine the Islamic republic.

First word of the meeting, to be held in Kazakhstan, came in comments from Iran's Supreme National Security Council to state news agency IRNA.

Later, a spokesperson for EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton said she hoped to make progress in allaying concerns about a programme Iran denies has a military purpose.

Both sides said the widely expected appointment to meet was made on Tuesday by Iran's deputy nuclear negotiator Ali Bagheri and EU counterpart Helga Schmid.

However, there were immediate signs from Iran, which holds a presidential election in June, that powerful figures were sceptical of their worth.

Western powers say Iran may be close to having the capacity to build a nuclear weapon, though Tehran insists it is seeking only electricity.

The US and its allies, which have imposed tough economic sanctions, are keen to show progress on an overall agreement for curbing and monitoring Iran's nuclear activities - not least because Israel, seeing itself especially threatened, has warned it could mount a pre-emptive attack.

A spokesperson for Ashton, who represents the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany, said: "She hopes that the talks will be productive and that concrete progress can be made towards a negotiated solution to meet the international community's concerns about the Iranian nuclear programme."

Western ‘arrogance’

But comments by Abdollah Haj-Sadeghi, a representative of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), indicated continued differences of opinion in Tehran; those may limit the prospect of narrowing the dispute with the West at the talks in Almaty, the first of their kind since negotiators met in Moscow in June.

"They will never want real dialogue and negotiations," Haj-Sadeghi was quoted as saying by the ISNA news agency, addressing religious students in the theological centre of Qom.

"Their goal is to inhibit the Islamic revolution. If they can't eliminate the Islamic revolution, they want to weaken and inhibit this revolution," he said. "A revolution with a religious nature cannot reconcile itself with arrogance."

Iranian officials often use the term "arrogant" to denote Western nations. It was not immediately clear whether he was referring to the continuing process of negotiation with the six world powers, known as the P5+1, or to the prospect of direct negotiations with the US, Iran's main adversary.

Haj-Sadeghi's remarks contrasted with those of Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi, who said in Berlin on Monday that he was "optimistic" regarding what he saw as a new approach from the US regarding Iran.

Shashank Joshi, a senior fellow and Middle East specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, said the mixed messages reflected Iran's "fragmented" political system, in which power is divided between elected and unelected bodies.

"Haj-Sadeghi's comments are consistent with a widely held Iranian view: That sanctions are less about the nuclear issue and more about regime change," Joshi said.

"He may therefore have been repeating a standard line rather than responding to Salehi."

Many Iranian leaders may be wary of entering talks that quickly collapse, Joshi said.

"Some of this rhetoric is therefore a way of managing expectations, and pushing responsibility for failure back on to the West," he said.

  • stewart.garner.9 - 2013-02-05 18:52

    tell usa and teh rest of the wol to et rid of their nuclear weapons first.look what usa did to japan and now they want to point fingers at iran?

      gary.landman - 2013-02-05 20:21

      Stewart, thats like a criminal saying "tell the citizens to disarm themselves first, then we will stop using weapons in robberies and holdups" etc. Nor very logical of you.

  • cindy.vanwyk.92 - 2013-02-05 22:16

    Why can a small country like israel have nukes, but iran cant... and who is making the rules?

      avremel.niselow - 2013-02-06 06:41

      The reason is simple, Iran is a fundamentalist dictatorship which has repeatedly declared its intention to wipe another country off the map. Israel is not.

  • Amarisca Oguz - 2013-02-06 13:57

    Its easy for America to make these countries look like the Dogs, because while they are defending them selfs,America goes behind their backs stealing their oil! America is the Devils playground! face the facts!

  • pages:
  • 1