Republicans step back from debt showdown

2013-01-24 10:52

Washington - Republicans sped legislation through the House of Representatives to suspend for nearly four months the requirement for Congress to approve a higher limit on America's borrowing, backing away from an immediate battle with second-term President Barack Obama and a possible first-ever default on the country's obligations.

Until changing course, Republicans had been threatening to demand dollar-for-dollar spending cuts to match the increase in the nation's borrowing limit.

At issue is the US debt - nearly $16.5 trillion and rising fast. That's the cumulative amount the country owes as a result of routinely spending more than it collects in taxes.

The law requires that Congress approve raising the amount the government can borrow to pay its obligations -such as payments to contractors, unemployment benefits and interest payments to US bondholders - as the debt exceeds the previous limit.

The House passed the measure on Wednesday by a 285-144 vote, a bipartisan showing on an initiative brought by majority Republicans. The Democratic-controlled Senate is expected to approve the debt bill as early as Friday or perhaps next week, and send it quickly to Obama for his signature.

The White House welcomed the legislation rather than face the threat of a first-ever default at the dawn of the president's second term in the White House, and spokesperson Jay Carney pointedly noted a "fundamental change" in strategy by the Republicans.


Raising the debt ceiling once occurred largely as a matter of legislative course. But in 2011, a fight over the borrowing limit led to the first downgrading of the US debt in the country's history, despite a last-minute deal that saw both Obama and the Republican opposition give ground.

If the debt cap is not raised, the government would default on its obligations by as early as 15 February, the Treasury says.

With the debt ceiling issue back front and centre in Washington, Democrats criticise Republicans for using it as a tool to push their attempts to cut social programmes and require a fight over the debt every few months.

Republicans had been threatening to use Congressional power over the federal budget to exact spending cuts from the Obama administration and Democrats that would equal the increase in the so-called debt ceiling.

Republican budget cutters have long targeted the social safety net programmes: Medicare health insurance for Americans 65 and older, Medicaid insurance payments that cover the poor, and Social Security, the federal pension for Americans of retirement age.

But the Republican leadership in the House decided to step back from an immediate confrontation by suspending the required approval of raising the debt limit until 18 May, apparently deciding that Obama held the upper hand over congressional Republicans following his easy re-election to a second term in November.

Threats rejected

The legislation does not set a specific debt limit. It would automatically increase the limit by the amount required to fund US government obligations through that date.

Even before his inauguration earlier this week, Obama rejected Republican threats not to approve raising the borrowing limit, saying he would not allow the opposition to "hold hostage" the "full faith and credit" of the United States. While he then voiced opposition to repeatedly having to deal with the issue, he apparently set that aside as the Republicans decided to suspend action for four months.

The House Republicans' legislation was also designed to prod Senate Democrats to pass a budget after almost four years of failing to do so. It calls for withholding the pay of lawmakers in either the House or Senate if their chamber fails to pass a congressional budget resolution by 15 April 15.

 House Republicans, who regained majority control of the chamber in 2010, have passed budgets for two consecutive years, but the Senate, which was in Democrat hands throughout Obama's first term, hasn't passed one since his first year in office.

Under Congress' arcane budget procedures, a congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that tries to set parameters for future legislation setting agency budgets and federal benefit programmes like Medicare.

On Sunday, Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer said the Senate would do just that and would use it to call for follow-up legislation that would increase revenues.

Most Republicans oppose higher taxes, contending that would only prove a drag on an already weak economic recovery. In the House especially, members of the Republican tea party faction won their place in Congress by promising constituents to shrink government and lower taxes.

  • stirrer.stirrer - 2013-01-24 11:17

    Question: If you arrive home from work, finding that a sewerage pipe had burst and your home is filled with s**t up to the ceiling, what is the best thing to do? Try to clear the s**t, or raise the ceiling?

  • zaaristotle - 2013-01-24 12:29

    And so the inevitable is once again delayed. The USA and Europe should realize that with competition from the developing world, they are not going to be dominating and competitive enough to either work or borrow themselves out of debt. Their golden age of dominant production is over. Their income streams are not going to grow enough to “one day” pay of the debt. They are going to have to learn to live with what they’ve get and compete for. This reminds me of some people I know. Instead of taking pain and fixing their spending, they run to the bank every few months to increase their over draught or their credit card limit.

      AllcoveredinNinjas - 2013-01-24 15:17

      What they actually doing is opening accounts for their kids and grand kids and maxing the credit on their accounts too.

  • simphiwe.charlie.5 - 2013-01-24 13:06

    I don't understand international finance issues but it seems to me that if you are the most indebted country in the world then surely you must be the poorest?

      avremel.niselow - 2013-01-24 13:38

      Not really, I have little debt and little assets, on the other hand a large company such as spar, has large debt and huge assets, they are far richer than I am.

  • pages:
  • 1