Syria: Rifts weaken unity of rebel groups

2012-08-20 11:00

Beirut - They share a single goal: To topple the Syrian regime of Bashar Assad. But the myriad rebel groups that have sprung up are riven by infighting about funding, weapons and even how to wage their war.

The rival groups are already plotting for a post-Assad Syria, jostling for power to improve their chances at calling the shots in the future.

Countless armed groups have emerged since last year, loosely coming together to form the Free Syrian Army as the uprising gradually transformed from a peaceful uprising into an armed rebellion in the face of the regime crackdown.

But the FSA lacks both a clear structure and a strong central leadership.

Reflecting popular concern over a lack of co-ordination among rebel groups, anti-regime demonstrators took to the streets on Friday under the slogan: "If our Free Army is united, victory is assured."

The FSA's command in Syria comprises 10 military councils headed by military defectors, and which brings together thousands of fighters - most of them civilians who have taken up arms and joined the insurgency.

'Coffee break meetings'

But many groups - including Islamist battalions - claim a certain autonomy from the FSA's leadership, even if they consider themselves part of it.

"Our leadership is independent," said the Muslim Brotherhood-funded Tawhid Brigade's Abdel Qader al-Saleh, chief of operations in the northern hub of Aleppo that has witnessed some of the fiercest fighting.

"When we decided to join the battle for Aleppo, we did not consult with the military council," Saleh said. "Why should we? We have the biggest number of fighters in Aleppo and its surroundings."

Saleh criticised the military councils' leadership, saying he would co-ordinate with fighters in the field, "not with people sitting behind their desks". He also described meetings with the military councils as mere "coffee breaks".

Indeed, a myriad of rebel brigades and battalions - most of them bearing Islamic names - claim responsibility for operations carried out against regime forces, in videos or statements posted on the internet.

"Islamist brigades get most of their funding from Qatar and Turkey," rebel commander Abu Mussab said. The military councils, meanwhile, receive non-lethal support from Saudi Arabia, the United States and the European Union.

Monopolising aid

"Al-Qaeda finances the jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood fund the moderates, and the rich Saudis indiscriminately finance both," he added.

Experts say jihadists constitute a small minority of fighters in the insurgency.

Many seemingly Salafist fighters only grow long beards and wear Islamic garb in order to benefit from funding from Sunni Muslim powerhouse Saudi Arabia, a Britain-based expert on Syria said on condition of anonymity.

But it is the Muslim Brotherhood, which has been exiled from Syria since the 1980s, which provides the majority of the funding, assistance and weapons, activists and rebels say.

Their goal, it seems, is to monopolise aid in a bid to carve out the lion's share of power, when and if Assad goes.

The West's reluctance to arm the rebels has forced them to radicalise and appeal to Salafist groups, which provide both funding and know-how, the FSA's Joint Command spokesperson Kassem Saadeddine said via Skype.

Sign of things to come

The United States and European countries have frequently warned that Syria's formidable military arsenal - which includes chemical weapons - may eventually fall into the hands of extremists.

"The rebellion will only become more Islamic and may even get out of hand should the situation get out of [FSA] control," said Saadeddine.

No doubt, divisions on the ground are a worrying sign of things to come in a post-Assad Syria. Frequently, the rebels have lost battles precisely because of their lack of co-ordination.

"One rebel group's surprise withdrawal from a main road in the once rebel-held Bab Sbaa district of [the central city of] Homs a month ago - without consulting the rest, meant the whole of the district could be reclaimed by the regime," an activist who identified himself as Rami al-Homsi said.

But Saadeddine was keen to emphasise that now is not the time for settling scores.

"We all share one goal: To bring down the regime," he said.

  • fidel.mgoqi - 2012-08-20 12:08

    "The rival groups are already plotting for a post-Assad Syria, jostling for power to improve their chances at calling the shots in the future." I thought "democracy" was what they were fighting for! How on earth should the Syrian government give up power to a rabble of disorganised armed militias.

      AnthonyfromAfrica - 2012-08-20 13:40

      WRONG AGAIN !!!!!!!.....AS ALWAYS !!!!! THAT is exactly what democracy is about, and what ,makes it soo strong, different opinions of how a country should be run. The ONLY common factor, the opposition has === the ouster of that assad terrorist !! That`s all, and hopefully they stay focused on that, They are nearly there!!!!!!

      AnthonyfromAfrica - 2012-08-20 18:19

      The problem with radicals is, they start to believe their own BS!!! Syria has no government, it has a dictatorship

      AnthonyfromAfrica - 2012-08-20 18:22

      And Fidel, ""How on earth should the Syrian government give up power...."" This is the whole point, they are not 'giving up' power, it is taken away from them...!! That is a BIG difference !!!!

  • craig.m.fulton - 2012-08-20 14:06

    You think the jostling is bad now with a common enemy. If the rebels win, which is likely considering their foreign support, this competition will only get fiercer once their common enemy has been removed. When this civil war is over the fighting won't stop.

      AnthonyfromAfrica - 2012-08-20 17:05

      THAT is what was said , over and over again, about Egypt and Libya, and although they are not yet there, they are far advanced in both these countries to have a more fair and just soceity, and one without the fear factor !!!!

  • imam.madi.129 - 2012-08-20 18:10

    I am not sure I am convinced that anthony is as dumb as he potrays himself. I think he simply does not want peace in syria at all and he does not care who wins, as long as there is war. That makes me believe he is a mossad agent. In his anatomy he has no particle caring about muslim or arab blood, as long as israel benefits. Here u are Antonovsky, ur cover has been blown so stop messing up with our minds and just keep funding ur enemy's enemy which is alquaeda and FSA at the moment.

      AnthonyfromAfrica - 2012-08-20 21:33

      Iman, WOW, GREAT comment, can hardly wait for your next one !!

  • craig.m.fulton - 2012-08-20 23:20

    Oh what a joy it must be to live in the clear cut world of idealist.

  • pages:
  • 1