The less religious give less charity

2012-08-20 22:19

Boston - A new study on the generosity of Americans suggests that states with the least religious residents are also the stingiest about giving money to charity.

The study released Monday by the Chronicle of Philanthropy found that residents in states where religious participation is higher than the rest of the nation, particularly in the South, gave the greatest percentage of their discretionary income to charity.

The Northeast, with lower religious participation, was the least generous to charities, with the six New England states filling the last six slots among the 50 states.

The study also found that patterns of charitable giving are coloured in political reds and blues.

Of the 10 least generous states, nine voted for Democrat Barack Obama for president in the last election. By contrast, of the 10 most generous states, eight voted for Republican John McCain.

But Peter Panepento, the Chronicle's assistant managing editor, said that political breakdown likely speaks to a state's religious make-up, not its prevailing political views. He noted the lowest-ranked Democrat states were also among the least religious, while the top-ranked Republican states were among the more religious.

"I don't know if I could go out and say it's a complete Republican-Democrat difference as much as it is different religious attitudes and culture in these states," he said.

The study was based on Internal Revenue Service records of people who itemised deductions in 2008, the most recent year statistics were available.

By focusing on the percentage given to charity from discretionary income - the money left over after necessities are paid for - the study aimed to remove variables such as the differing costs of living around the country, Panepento said. The data allowed researchers to detail charitable giving down to the ZIP code, he said.


The most generous state was Utah, where residents gave 10.6% of their discretionary income to charity. Next were Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee and South Carolina. The least generous was New Hampshire, at 2.5%, followed by Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

In Boston, semi-retired carpenter Stephen Cremins said the traditional New England ideal of self-sufficiency might explain the lower giving, particularly during tight times when people have less to spare.

"Charity begins at home. I'm a big believer of that, you know, you have to take care of yourself before you can help others," Cremins said.

The study found that in the Northeast region, including New England, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York, people gave 4.1% of their discretionary income to charity. The percentage was 5.2% in the Southern states, a region from Texas east to Delaware and Florida, and including most of the so-called Bible Belt.

The Bible mandates a 10% annual donation, or tithe, to the church, and the donation is commonly preached as a way to thank God, care for others and show faith in God's provision. But it has a greater emphasis in some faiths.

In Mormon teachings, for instance, Latter Day Saints are required to pay a 10% tithe to remain church members in good standing, which helps explain the high giving rate in heavily-Mormon Utah.

"Any LDS member who is faithful does that," said Valerie Mason, 70, of Mesa, Arizona, during an interview in Salt Lake City. "Some struggle with it. Some leave the church because of it. But we believe in the blessing... Tithing does bring the blessing of God's promise."

Alan Wolfe, a political science professor at Boston College, said it's wrong to link a state's religious make-up with its generosity. People in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits, Wolfe said. And the distribution is based purely on need, rather than religious affiliation or other variables, said Wolfe, also head of the college's Boisi Centre for Religion and Public Life.

Wolfe said people in less religious states "view the tax money they're paying not as something that's forced upon them, but as a recognition that they belong with everyone else, that they're citizens in the common good... I think people here believe that when they pay their taxes, they're being altruistic."

Among other notable findings of the study:

— People who earn $200 000 per year give a greater percentage to charity when they live in ZIP codes with fewer people who are as wealthy as they are.

— People who earn between $50 000 and $75 000 annually give a higher percentage of their income to charity (7.6%) than those who make $100 000 or more (4.2%).

  • zaatheist - 2012-08-21 05:38

    There are a whole lot of things wrong with this report - This is not a professional independent survey but an analysis if tax deductions for payments to “charities” by a commercial news organisation. In the US donations to churches and “religious organisations” are considered charitable and are tax deductible (501(c)(3) IRS status). Of course more money is paid to churches in the bible belt states than in the less religious states. So giving money to Benny Hinn or Scientology or any other tin pot millionaire televangelist with a private jet is "charitable"? Or donating to the Mormon church so they can launch a program in California against legal rights for gays. That's charity? The Catholic Church has had to pay out more than a billion dollars in compensation to clergy child rape victims and faces claims for billions more. Where did the money come from? Tax deductible “Charitable” donations. PAH! Religions don't collect money to help the needy, if that was their purpose they'd simply set up charities or collect money for international secular charities such as the Red Cross or Doctors without Borders. Instead their collections are solely for the purpose of disseminating their own religious beliefs in the guise of humanitarianism. They should be taxed, and charities should be banned from having religious affiliations.

      adele.kendall.16 - 2012-08-21 07:19

      Great comment

      sudika.harkhu - 2012-08-21 07:32

      Zaatheist, go read up on Gift of the Givers. Started by a Muslim. See if they are disseminating their beliefs to anyone. Nopes. They arent. They help wherever they can.

      zaatheist - 2012-08-21 07:47

      sudika.harkhu Did I mention Muslims? My point still holds. "if that was their purpose they'd simply set up charities or collect money for international secular charities such as the Red Cross or Doctors without Borders." Why have separate religion based charities?

      wesleywt - 2012-08-21 07:54

      Charity has always been the best way to get new recruits for a religion. Perhaps we need a" Hitch Charity" funding schools and jobs for Muslim women .

      janalbert.vandenberg - 2012-08-21 08:54 -- I thought this was interesting :-)

  • wesleywt - 2012-08-21 07:41

    So, this study says Obama voters a heathen stingy b*stards. Hmmmm #stats&damnlies

      SarcasticAgnostic - 2012-08-21 08:04

      No, this study points out that the red states give their money away much easier than the blue states. So if you're gonna start a scam, start in a red state.

  • dustin.mccrindle.5 - 2012-08-21 08:35

    It would be interesting to see how the stats turn out if tithes were taken out of the equation. BUT it is funny how stats don't lie until they go against your beliefs (this goes for religious ppl

  • jody.beggs - 2012-08-21 09:23

    That's because their spare 10% goes to church ministers new car and house. Xians only give freely to themselves ...

  • pngee - 2012-08-21 09:51

    Charity begins at home, you and yours first then perhaps consider helping others, got nothing to do with religion.

  • WarrenStylin - 2012-08-21 15:20

    The Highly religious states the people also most probably feel pressured through guilt into giving to the "Charity\Church" as it will be frowned upon if you don't.

  • pages:
  • 1