US Congress extends surveillance law

2012-12-28 22:32

Washington - The Senate gave final congressional approval on Friday to a bill renewing the US government's authority to monitor overseas phone calls and e-mails of suspected foreign spies and terrorists - but not Americans - without obtaining a court order for each intercept.

The classified Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act programme was on the brink of expiring by year's end. The 73 - 23 vote sent the bill to a supportive US President Barack Obama, whose signature would keep the warrantless intercept programme in operation for another five years.

The Senate majority rejected arguments from an unusual combination of Democratic liberals and ideological Republican conservatives, who sought to amend the bill to require the government to reveal statistics showing whether any Americans were swept up in the foreign intercepts. The attempt lost, with 52 votes against and 43 in favour.

The Obama administration's intelligence community and leaders of the Senate's intelligence committee said the information should be classified and opposed the disclosure, repeating that it is illegal to target Americans without an order from a special US surveillance court.

The group seeking more disclosures also sought - unsuccessfully - a determination by the government of whether any intelligence agency attempted to use information gained from foreigners to search for information on Americans without a warrant, referred to as "back door" searches.


The prohibition against targeting Americans without a warrant protects Americans wherever they are, in the US or somewhere else.

The debate focused on the need to balance national security with civil liberties. Senators Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, and Saxby Chambliss, a Republican, the chair and top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, warned that the classified intercept programme would be jeopardised if even statistical information was disclosed.

They sparred repeatedly with Sen Ron Wyden, a Democrat, who held the bill up for months until he was allowed to argue on the Senate floor that Americans' civil liberties were in danger under the law.

During debate that began on Thursday, Feinstein bluntly told Wyden, a fellow liberal, that she opposed his disclosure amendment because, "I know where this goes. Where it goes is to destroy the programme."

Wyden insisted his group was interested only in making public estimates that already existed. In insisting on information about whether the foreign intercepts led to warrantless "back door" searches of Americans, the senator said there already had been one instance of such a violation.

He said the finding of a violation, details of which remain classified, "demonstrates the impact of the law on Americans' privacy has been real and is not hypothetical".

"How many phone calls to and from Americans have been swept up in this authority?" he asked.


A member of the intelligence committee, Wyden argued he was trying to "strike a balance between security and liberty" and that "the 300 million Americans who expect us to strike that balance... are in the dark".

When Americans are targeted for surveillance, the government must get a warrant from a special 11-judge court of US district judges appointed by the Supreme Court.

In contrast, when foreigners abroad are targeted, the surveillance court approves annual certifications submitted by the attorney general and the director of national Intelligence that identify certain categories of foreign intelligence targets.

The Obama administration has called the secret intercepts "invaluable to the US government's efforts to detect and prevent threats to America and its allies, while providing robust protections for the civil liberties and privacy of US persons".

It said if Congress had failed to extend the programme, there would have been "a significant loss of intelligence" that would have impeded the ability to respond quickly to new threats.

The House in September approved the same five-year extension of the law by a vote of 301 - 118.

  • marcanthonytaylor - 2012-12-29 00:29

    Know your enemy, be warned.

  • peter.fraser.92754 - 2012-12-29 01:53

    What are wrong with these people ? Do they have nothing else to do but to suffer from phobias? If they stop poking their noses in other countries businesses and concentrate on their own economy and mass killings by their own citizens etc, there would be no need to watch their backs all the time. But I suppose wars and spying are big business in gthe US of A and keeps a lot of Americans employed.It also keeps the President occupied.

      J.Stephen.Whiteley - 2012-12-29 06:43

      This is why their Government has a deficit.

      kortbroek.duplessis - 2012-12-29 07:10

      Well the war party is about to come to an end because of the "fiscal cliff". Deep spending cuts in the military will send most of the troops home, and of course huge unemployment

      kissdissection - 2012-12-29 09:44

      Agreed! Especially within countries that want nothing to do with them.

  • Bingo - 2012-12-29 02:04

    Note the numbers! True democracy where politicians vote with their conscience or beliefs even against their own political party that proposes a bill. Can you imagine our dictators reactions to such a move by a comrade...

  • Philip - 2012-12-29 05:37

    This is why they have the 2nd Amendment.

      Raymon - 2012-12-29 10:19

      Mmm. Maybe thats why they are pushing the whole Gun control issue.

  • herman.kramer.988 - 2012-12-29 07:18

    "Land of the Free" What a load of BS!

  • JCKR2 - 2012-12-29 09:16

    I would wonder why AMERICANS are excluded. It's not that the government wants to know who is shagging illegally, or who is going out to a restaurant for the evening - this is serious business. If you are not planning to kill the president, or something like that, you are safe.

      Raymon - 2012-12-29 14:49

      Americans may be excluded by this act because their being spied upon already via the patriot act.

  • pages:
  • 1