House Republicans press administration on Iran payment

2016-09-08 22:23
GOP Representative Sean Duffy (AP).

GOP Representative Sean Duffy (AP).

Multimedia   ·   User Galleries   ·   News in Pictures Send us your pictures  ·  Send us your stories

Washington - Obama administration officials told Congress on Thursday that Iran wanted "immediate access" to $1.7bn paid by the United States in cash to settle a decades-old arbitration claim between the two countries.

At a hearing called by House Republicans, officials from the departments of Treasury, State and Justice defended the payment and its cash delivery. An initial $400m was delivered January 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners, and the Republicans are calling it a ransom.

Christopher Backemeyer, a deputy assistant secretary of state for Iranian affairs, said Iran wanted immediate access to the money, but he said he wasn't aware whether Iran had asked for cash. He said it was his understanding that the money is going to "critical economic needs" in Iran.

GOP Representative Sean Duffy of Wisconsin, chairperson of the House Financial Services subcommittee on oversight and investigation, said the evidence presented made it difficult to believe the payment wasn't a ransom. He asked the witnesses if they could guarantee that the money will not fund terrorism.

"I can't speak for every dollar that goes in and out of Iran, as you know," Backemeyer said.

The administration had claimed the payment and the prisoner release were separate, but recently acknowledged the cash was used as leverage until the Americans were allowed to leave Iran. The remaining $1.3bn represented estimated interest on the Iranian cash the US had held since the 1970s as payment for a never-completed military equipment sale.

The hearing was the first of several planned by Republicans who have opposed last year's international accord to limit Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief.

‘Serious banking problems’

Representative Jeb Hensarling, chair of the full committee, said the witnesses only agreed to appear after the committee had threatened a subpoena. He pressed the officials on why the payment had to be made in cash and whether it was legal to make a cash payment.

Hensarling, R-Texas, said the payment could "put a price on the head of every tourist, soldier, airman and marine who serves or visits overseas".

US officials have maintained that cash was necessary because of US and international sanctions that have isolated Iran from the international finance system.

Lisa Grosh, a legal advisor for the State Department's Office of International Claims and Investment Disputes, said Iran was having "serious banking problems" as a result of the sanctions.

The January 17 agreement involved the return of the $400m, plus the additional $1.3bn in interest. Administration officials have described those terms as favourable compared to what might have been expected from a tribunal set up in The Hague, Netherlands, to rule on claims between the two countries. US officials have said they expected an imminent ruling on the claim and settled with Tehran instead.

The payment "was the best way to avoid a possible decision from the tribunal ordering us to pay a lot more," Grosh said.

Unusual payment

Democrats said the hearing was purely political.

"It sounds like my friends in the other side of the aisle would have preferred we pay the money and not get the hostages back," said Representative Michael Capuano, D-Mass.

Paul Ahern, the assistant general counsel for enforcement and intelligence at the Treasury Department, said the $400m came from a fund called the Foreign Military Sales Trust Fund. He said they had the money transferred to a European bank, where the money was converted to foreign currency.

The $1.3bn came from a fund administered by the Treasury Department for settling litigation claims. The Judgment Fund is taxpayer money that Congress has permanently approved in the event it's needed, allowing the president to bypass direct congressional approval to make a settlement. The US previously paid out $278m in Iran-related claims by using the fund in 1991.

Cash was "the most reliable way to make sure they got the payment in a timely manner," Ahern said.

Republicans noted that it is unusual to make a payment in cash to another country and that it seemed as though the administration was trying to hide it.

Iran "wanted the cash because they are trying to fund terror," asserted GOP Representative Ed Royce of California, a committee member who also leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

That committee is expected to vote next week of his legislation that would prohibit cash payments to Iran and demand transparency on future settlements. Republican senators have endorsed similar legislation that would bar payments from the Judgment Fund to Iran until Tehran pays the nearly $55.6bn that US courts have judged that it owes to American victims of Iranian terrorism.

Read more on:    us  |  iran

Join the conversation! encourages commentary submitted via MyNews24. Contributions of 200 words or more will be considered for publication.

We reserve editorial discretion to decide what will be published.
Read our comments policy for guidelines on contributions.

Inside News24

Traffic Alerts
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.


Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire network.


Location Settings

News24 allows you to edit the display of certain components based on a location. If you wish to personalise the page based on your preferences, please select a location for each component and click "Submit" in order for the changes to take affect.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.