Washington — The Trump administration said on Monday it was cutting off US funding to the United Nations agency for reproductive health, accusing the agency of supporting population control programmes in China that include coercive abortion.By halting assistance to the UN Population Fund, the Trump administration is following through on promises to let socially conservative policies that President Donald Trump embraced in his campaign determine the way the US government operates and conducts itself in the world. Though focused on forced abortion — a concept opposed by liberals and conservatives alike — the move to invoke the "Kemp-Kasten amendment" was sure to be perceived as a gesture to anti-abortion advocates and other conservative interests.The UN fund will lose $32.5m in funding from the 2017 budget, the State Department said, with funds shifted to similar programmes at the US Agency for International Development.It wasn't immediately clear whether the UN fund would also lose out on tens of millions of additional dollars it has typically received from the US in "non-core" funds.Under a three-decade-old law, the US is barred from funding organisations that aid or participate in forced abortion of involuntary sterilisation. It's up to each administration to determine which organisations meet that condition. 'Free of coercion'The UN Population Fund has typically been cut off during Republican administrations and had its funding resumed when Democrats control the White House.The Senate Foreign Relations Committee was notified of the move by the State Department in a letter received on Monday.The letter followed a formal designation by Tom Shannon, the State Department's undersecretary of political affairs, that said the fund "supports, or participates in the management of, a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilisation."In a lengthy memorandum obtained by The Associated Press, the State Department said the UN fund partners with China's National Health and Family Planning Commission, responsible for overseeing China's "two-child policy" — a loosened version of the notorious "one-child policy" in place from 1979 to 2015.It said the UN collaborates with the Chinese agency on family planning. Still, the memo acknowledged there was no evidence of UN support for forced abortions or sterilisation in China.The UN Population Fund, known as UNFPA, said it regretted the US move and argued it was "erroneous" to suggest it was complicit in China's policies."UNFPA refutes this claim, as all of its work promotes the human rights of individuals and couples to make their own decisions, free of coercion or discrimination," the agency said in a statement.The designation was the latest move by the Trump administration to prioritise traditionally conservative issues in the federal budget.The Trump administration has vowed to cut all dollars for climate change programming, and also restored the so-called global gag rule, which prohibits funding to non-governmental groups that support even voluntary abortions.Reprogramming US fundingThe Trump administration has also signalled that it no longer sees a need for the US to so generously fund UN and other international organisations.The White House has proposed cutting roughly one-third from the State Department's budget, with much of it expected to come from foreign aid and global organisation dollars, although Congress is expected to restore at least some of that funding.The UN agency's mission involves promoting universal access to family planning and reproductive health, with a goal of reducing maternal deaths and practices like female genital mutilation.The cut-off funds will be "reprogrammed" to USAID's Global Health Programmes account to focus on similar issues said a State Department official, who wasn't authorised to comment by name and requested anonymity.The Kemp-Kasten amendment, enacted in 1985, led to some of the UN agency's funding being initially cut off, then restored by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1993, USAID said in a report. Republican George W. Bush's administration reversed the decision in 2002, but President Barack Obama — a Democrat — gave the funding back after taking office.