Associated Newspapers says Meghan Markle used friends as 'PR agents' in latest court proceedings

0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
Photo: Rosa Woods/Getty Images
  • Associated Newspapers is arguing Meghan Markle and Prince Harry cooperated with a recent book about their life as a means of influencing the public.
  • Their claim comes to amend their defence against breach of privacy and copywright allegations in an ongoing case.
  • Harry and Meghan's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke , reitterated to the court that the royal couple "did not collaborate" with the book's authors.


Lawyers for Meghan Markle on Monday denied she and Prince Harry collaborated with the authors of a recent book about their life together.

The denial came as Associated Newspapers sought to amend its defence against claims it breached her privacy and copyright by publishing extracts of a letter she wrote to her father.

Former actress Markle became the Duchess of Sussex when she married Prince Harry in 2018. The couple earlier this year left frontline royal duties and moved to the United States.

At a hearing in the case at the High Court in London, Associated, which publishes the Mail on Sunday weekly and Mail Online website, applied to amend its defence.

It argued that she "co-operated with the authors of the recently published book Finding Freedom to put their version of certain events" out there.

Antony White, representing Associated, said the book gave "every appearance of having been written with their (Meghan and Harry's) extensive co-operation".

The news group wanted to allege that she "caused or permitted information to be provided directly or indirectly to, and co-operated with, the authors... including by giving or permitting them to be given information about the letter".

It argues it was justified in publishing extracts of the letter in 2019 because five of Markle's friends had spoken about it in an interview with the US magazine People.

The Mail on Sunday said she used her friends "as de facto PR agents" in order "to influence the media in a positive way". 

Meghan's legal team said extracts of the letter in question and included in the book were "lifted" from the articles under dispute.

"The claimant and her husband did not collaborate with the authors on the book, nor were they interviewed for it, nor did they provide photographs to the authors for the book," lawyer Justin Rushbrooke told the court.

The case is the most high-profile in Harry and Meghan's increasingly bitter war with the media, particularly the British tabloid press.

The court was told that overall legal costs were estimated to be about £3 million (R64.5 million) up to and including trial, which is due to begin in January.

Harry and Meghan's retirement in March came after reports she was deeply unhappy with life inside the royal family and complaints about media intrusion.

The couple, who live with their young son, Archie, in California, recently signed an exclusive deal with the streaming giant Netflix for an undisclosed fee.

They have set up a non-profit organisation to promote education, mental health and well-being.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24