The Johannesburg High Court has found that Afriforum’s deputy chief executive officer Ernst Roets was not in contempt of court when he tweeted a picture of the apartheid flag just hours after the Equality Court ruled that any gratuitous displays of the old flag amounted to hate speech on August 21.
Roets posted a picture of the old flag with the caption: “Did I just commit hate speech?”
The backlash was swift but Roets responded by saying that he only posted the picture for academic reasons.
“The judgment said the flag may be used for academic purposes. I am a scholar of constitutional law, currently doing my doctorate. This is an academic question,” Roets tweeted.
In his judgment on Tuesday morning, Judge Colin Lamont said that though he was of the view that Roets might in due course be found to have breached the provisions of the Equality Act, he was not in contempt of court.
Lamont said that the Equality Court’s ruling did not contain a directive prohibiting the display of the flag. “There is order ad factum praestandum,” he said.
The Nelson Mandela Foundation’s Luzuko Koti said they would study the judgment before deciding on the next step.
“We took this matter to the high court because we are committed to strengthening our democracy and our institutions, particularly our Constitution.
“Part our democracy is our courts. Deputy Judge President Phineas Mojapelo ruled that if you are gratuitously flying the flag you are actually committing hate speech and on the same day someone tweeted the flag. We found that in contempt of court, flying the flag gratuitously in the face of South Africans,” Koti said.
A smiling Roets said that he was expecting the court to rule in his favour. “We would’ve been very concerned and surprised if the judge found that I have to be thrown in jail as the Nelson Mandela Foundation has argued,” Roets said.
“We need to ask ourselves what sort of democracy we are trying to have in this country. If we are saying that it’s a democracy in which freedom is cherished and in which people can express their views even if we disagree, then this is certainly not initiative of the Nelson Mandela Foundation, they are 180 degrees in the wrong direction,” Roets said.
Roets said that they have already filed an appeal against the Equality Courts ruling that the gratuitous display of the flag amounted to hate speech.
“We will study this judgment and consult with our legal teams because there is a new set of circumstances currently and we will establish a way forward,” Roets said.
The ANC’s Dakota Legoete said that would study the judgment with the Nelson Mandela Foundation and decide on the way forward. “We think that matters related to racial bigotry and contradictions in relation to symbols are matters that are also civil and not only matters of the Equality Court,” Legoete said.
“You can’t go to Israel and fly the German swastika. Equally in South Africa you can’t fly the old apartheid flag in a new dispensation, where we have a new flag and Constitution. We can not subject our citizens to be loyal to two flags. They must be loyal to one flag, one Constitution, one election system and loyalty to one government,” Legoete said.
Journalist | City Press
|Rise above the clutter | Choose your news | City Press in your inbox|
|City Press is an agenda-setting South African news brand that publishes across platforms. Its flagship print edition is distributed on a Sunday.|