The ‘market standard’ of exploitation?

Contemporary South Africa is characterised by a shameful inequality that compounds the structural disenfranchisement and poverty of millions.

The situation is exacerbated by an economy built on the exploitation of a predominantly black population in need of work and skills. We have made numerous justifications for it, ranging from “conditions are worse in other countries” to “that’s the market standard” – as if our local market does not attest to centuries of exploitation by those who decide the value of other people’s work.

This week, a women’s magazine found itself having to defend an internship offering R30 a day, 8.30am to 5pm, for six months.

Rightfully, the internship has been criticised. South Africa’s challenge of having an indebted working class, which often uses unsecured and expensive loans to supplement meagre earnings, is not happening by chance.

It is being driven by various factors, including unpaid internships, that have been able to tap into desperate, unskilled and inexperienced labour that is systemically undervalued and thus underpaid. And when it is not being undervalued – or made to add value while not being remunerated accordingly – it is often being excluded.

By excluded, I mean those training opportunities that require people to choose between “gaining skills and exposure” and being able to eat – the so-called opportunities that further disadvantage people who need the work.

Because they are probably unable to work for free, they miss out on internship opportunities.

When positions do not explicitly say they don’t want poor people but they can only be accessed by people with the privilege of a family, spouse or other financial means to support them, that is exclusionary.

And because class is so intertwined with race in this country, it will most likely disadvantage and exclude young black people.

It is also, largely, black people who must make the difficult choice between skills and money – as if it were impossible to get both, especially when both are essential.

Ironically, women’s magazines are likely to not just contribute to racial inequality but also to gender inequality by exploiting young women’s labour – a shameful indictment on publications that position themselves as advocates for equality.

That countless others have had to “make it work” does not justify the pervasive practice of exploiting the working class.

And our having become “okay” with the inequality of contemporary South Africa does not make it ethical.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24

E-Editions

All your favourite publications in one place.
Read now
Voting Booth
Former president Jacob Zuma's legal team has given the chairperson of the commission of inquiry into state capture, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, an ultimatum. Either he recuse himself or Zuma will either prolong proceedings or exercise his right to remain silent
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Zuma is undermining Zondo
63% - 850 votes
Zuma is within his rights
9% - 116 votes
Zondo has done a good job
29% - 388 votes
Vote