Thumbs up to cabinet parity but not everything is genderised


At last, South Africa’s cabinet has actual gender parity.

Half of President Cyril Ramaphosa’s engine of government now consists of women.

This really is a breath of fresh air – not just for South Africa, but across the region.

One hopes that this will spur on the additional six SADC countries due to hold elections this year.

That means South Africa, specifically the governing party’s 50% gender parity and participation by 2030 is not a lip service.

This gender parity is stipulated by articles 12 and 13 of the revised SADC protocol on gender and development, of which South Africa is a signatory.

While praising this great achievement, we should be mindful that holistically, South Africa has failed to achieve 50% gender parity in parliament.

That remains a big concern as the country is left with only two elections before the 2030 deadline.

The country has to take action, I leave that to the ANC Women’s League to see how they can jump on the bandwagon.

Of course for good reason, ensuring that ANC Policy Conference adopts legislation of gender quotas, which will enforce all South Africa Political parties to adopt gender parity in their political lists.

Ramaphosa’s Cabinet is indeed an achievement and not only for its gender parity.

The portfolios given to women are not just the usual ones that are seen as addressing women’s practical gender needs and which tend to entrench division of labour by gender.

In the new cabinet women are leading some strategic ministries, most notably the ministry of state security and the ministry of defence and military veterans.

Other powerful ministries now headed by women are human settlement water and sanitation; public works and infrastructure, forestry, environment and fisheries; and land reform and rural development.

The fact that it is women who now occupy some of South Africa’s key strategic and resource-allocation positions represents a significant shift from the past.

This is noteworthy, not only in terms of the perspective that women are likely to bring to these roles, but also for the perceptual shift that a gender-balanced Cabinet will undoubtedly bring about.

While the portfolio of cooperative governance and traditional affairs may not be seen as quite such a prestigious appointment as defence or state security, the appointment of the highly experienced Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma to lead this ministry is a welcome decision from the perspective of gender equality and women advancement.

Dlamini-Zuma’s commitment to gender issues has been a feature of her leadership in all the positions she has occupied.

Under her leadership (1999-2009) the department of foreign affairs became the first and only department to have a head of gender at chief-directorate level, and as chair of the African Union Commission (2012-2017) the AU gender directorate was within her office.

Clearly Dlamini-Zuma brings the necessary strategic clout to juggle the competing interests that her department represents.

At the level of local government, it is crucial that the leadership is both firm and far-sighted enough to ensure that the interests, specifically practical gender needs of the most marginalised members of society, namely poor, illiterate and semi-literate and rural women, are strongly represented.

Dlamini-Zuma’s long-term experience in other ministries as well – health (1994-1999), home affairs (2009-2012) and recently as minister in the presidency – means that she brings to the portfolio an exceptional understanding of how the levers of governance operate.

This is likely to help in the immense task of improving the delivery of basic services to poor women in part and need secular.

Housing is another of the politically fraught issue that Dlamini-Zuma will oversee, as is early childhood development and primary health care.

If anyone has the capacity to hold together this mixed-bag portfolio and at the same time make sure that the interests of the most vulnerable are foregrounded is Dlamini-Zuma.

However, my big concern in the restructuring of ministries is the killing of the ministry of women in the presidency.

The existence of this ministry was a major gain for women of South Africa despite the fact that it remained poorly resourced and unable to deliver on its mandate.

In the new dispensation the ministry of women has disappeared and instead there is a combined ministry in the presidency for women, youth and persons with disabilities.

The interests of women do not necessarily coincide with those of persons with disabilities, who need specific types of care and consideration, or with those of youth, who are in a developmental stage and still need guidance.

What I expected from the president was a strategy that would develop the (now disbanded) ministry of women and allocate resources to it in the same way that resources have been allocated to other ministries.

Alternatively, I had hoped that the erstwhile “office on the status of women in the presidency” would be revisited.

That office did a lot of strategic work in terms of researching and documenting status of women across the country and had representatives in each department national and provincially, “gender focal points” legislation, and notably the Sexual Offences Act emanated from some of their research projects.

It was also responsible for setting up the now defunct South Africa gender machinery.

Its counterpart at parliamentary level was the joint monitoring committee on the quality of life and status of women. This meant that gender was taken care of both at executive and legislative level.

There was substantive saving of the little we have as the country as this office was managed by officials, who needed to drivers and security.

Mr President, sir, is it not time to reflect on what has worked best to address gender inequalities and women’s subordination in the country?

Some of the people who were in the forefront of setting up these institutional arrangements are still around, working somewhere.

It is common knowledge that the president takes gender issues seriously as attested to in many of his speeches and through the national summit on gender-based violence he convened in 2018.

Despite the welcome positioning of women in strategic Cabinet portfolios there remains a distinct danger that, in the collapsing of the ministry of women, gender issues will be subsumed.

• Nomkhitha Gysman is a gender specialist currently working for the SADC parliamentary forum as a gender programme manager. She writes in her personal capacity

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24


Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Consumers are paying exorbitant rates for power because of extra fee charges that are added when buying prepaid electricity. This is on top of an already high electricity tariff rate. Some of these fees are not even regulated. Should government regulate electricity fees?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
17% - 3 votes
0% - 0 votes
Scrap fees
83% - 15 votes