At the heart of the PIC's woes is a lack of ethical leadership

accreditation
Lack of ethical leadership at the heart of the PIC's woes
Lack of ethical leadership at the heart of the PIC's woes

Behind the recent suspension of the Public Investment Corporation’s (PIC’s) executive head of listed investments, Fidelis Madavo, is an apparent disconnection between operational functionality on the ground, including the authorities and decision making powers; administrative capacities and staffing and technical capacity of the PIC’s line departments; and a centralised, evidently unaccountable executive.

To appreciate the scale and depth of the leadership and governance challenges in light of the inquiry into allegations of impropriety at the corporation, let’s start with context.

The PIC’s stunning reversal of fortune has been years in the making.

Until 2005, when the PIC was “corporatised”, a large portion of funds was invested in equity and capital markets. Even though client mandates varied across asset classes, there was considerable coherence in the basic orientation towards listed equities and related targets.

All 23 funds managed by the PIC had clear and explicit investment mandates to diversify their portfolios, with a focus on stable returns in the long term.

However, with growth in the size of assets under management and expansion has come serious governance lapses and impropriety.

It appears the PIC’s senior executive management and its board have constantly failed to act in the best interest of its clients and the country.

Critically, the investment committee has been embroiled in just about every scandal involving the PIC, given that it is responsible for more than R2 trillion in assets under management.

The much-publicised multibillion-rand VBS bank scandal is testimony to the failure of the investment committee in its fiduciary duties.

It is government employees, beneficiaries and pensioners, who are robbed and vulnerable.

The combined effect of all these factors has placed in the public domain issues that need urgent redress to reassert the PIC’s reputation as a financial services provider of choice and enable the corporation to attract and retain the best talent for the business.

It would appear the PIC has been used to dish out patronage at the expense of its investors.

How is it possible that more than R200 billion is lost and nobody is held accountable?

The PIC has, as a result, been serving as a till for some thieves to enrich themselves from.

It appears the PIC’s senior executive management and its board have constantly failed to act in the best interest of its clients and the country.

Although the commission on state capture might have done a good job unearthing the scale of state capture, the PIC commission features corruption running into billions of rands.

The common denominator in all these commissions is that taxpayers’ money was being stolen and squandered with impunity.

It is only after those complicit in looting the public purse have been brought to book that the road to economic recovery will begin.

For as long as those who are implicated in corruption walk free, very little will be achieved.

Resignations and suspensions are not enough. There must be consequences for all the wrongdoers.

Equally, the quality and alignment of skills, leadership and organisational capabilities of the PIC should match the challenges the country faces.

A number of weaknesses were recognised in a World Bank review of the Government Employees’ Pension Fund (GEPF) and PIC’s alternative investment activities as far back as 2011, following the GEPF’s review of its investment strategy and decision to introduce new asset classes and markets to try to further diversify its portfolio.

This was compounded by the findings of a more recent Climate Survey by Deloitte and the spate of negative media publicity on weak investment choices, “political interference” in the PIC and “a decline in the motivation of the growing workforce which is the most significant asset in an asset management business, accounting for nearly 60% of the costs of the organisation”.

Both reviews pointed to loopholes in the system of governance and gross derelictions by senior executives and, along with it, a complicated array of “suspicious” investments that have been thrown into sharp focus across a wide spectrum of deals and investment decisions and, lately, allegations of corruption.

Although no reported material breakdowns, contingencies or uncertainties in the functioning of PIC systems, procedures and controls came to the attention of the audit risk committee, a prominent drawback and worrying portent of the change mandate has concerned the delegation of authority, where decision making should necessarily mean greater adaptability and, therefore, agility in the governance model and related processes in a context of expansion.

Read: A timeline of how the VBS Mutual Bank scandal unfolded

And therein lies the rub. In theory, as organisations such as the PIC grow in size, stature and complexity, so too ought the degree of discretion and oversight, where compliance and risk management rules and systems, delegations of authority, reporting and compliance structures and processes, and the institutional and organisational capacity and human capabilities required to meet the PIC’s revised commitment are adapted to organisational levels exercising context-dependent decisions.

Instead, the governance practice has encouraged a rule by executive committee and, therefore, tension between fiduciaries, diluted accountability and fostered suboptimal decision making.

Such diagnoses elevate the importance of assessing the reasonableness and adequacy of policies and interventions that have recently affected the performance of the corporation.

Indeed, the fitness of the PIC – the quality and alignment of skills, leadership and organisational capabilities to these challenges – supports a complete clean-up of this critical institution. Information in the public domain points to a compromised board that has had oversight over several dubious transactions in recent years.

As Team SA is hard at work trying to attract investors in the economic sphere at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the often-asked question is: “What are you doing about corruption?”

The PIC commission provides an opportunity for the corporation to start afresh with a team of qualified and able leaders who believe in South Africa and its potential. The past decade was wasted. Now is the time to grow a prosperous economy that will create jobs and improve the lives of our people.

Let the commission do its work. It’s only when the tide goes out that we’ll learn who has been swimming naked.

Mbele is Business Leadership SA’s director of strategy and marketing. He writes his opinion piece in his personal capacity

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24

E-Editions

Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
The CCMA has ruled that the dismissal of an employee for refusing to be vaccinated against Covid-19 was fair. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
It is her right to refuse
22% - 19 votes
She is a risk to others
49% - 43 votes
Mandatory vaccination ?
13% - 11 votes
No to mandatory vaxxing
17% - 15 votes
Vote