2 men in coffin assault lose bid to be released on bail

Willem Oosthuizen and Theo Jackson appear in court in Middelburg in June. Picture Deaan Vivier/Netwerk24
Willem Oosthuizen and Theo Jackson appear in court in Middelburg in June. Picture Deaan Vivier/Netwerk24

The two farmworkers who forced a man into a coffin and threatened to pour petrol on him have lost another court battle.

Willem Oosthuizen and Theo Jackson were fighting to be released on bail, pending their leave to appeal their convictions and sentences.

Their application for leave to appeal the refusal by the high court to grant bail was dismissed on the grounds that there are no reasonable prospects of success and there was no other compelling reason why an appeal should be heard, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled on Friday. Oosthuizen and Jackson approached the appeal court for leave to appeal the refusal of their bail application after they were sentenced last year.

However, the court said it was not in the interests of justice that the pair be released. The court said counsel on behalf of both the applicants had conceded that race was a factor that impacted on the case.

“It is sad, as this case and others in the public eye demonstrate, that we as a nation have reached this stage of racial polarisation and that we have not yet overcome the deep divisions that our history imposed on us. It is the very antithesis of our constitutional compact.

“We cannot ignore the fact that racial intolerance is something that can be exploited by those intent on undoing and subverting constitutional values. Racist behaviour is absolutely unacceptable and courts can rightly be expected to deal with it firmly,” the court said.

On Monday, the legal representatives for the two men were asked by the judges if race was not the underlying factor when Oosthuizen and Jackson forced Victor Mlotshwa into a coffin and threatened to pour petrol on him.

The matter was heard by judges Mahomed Navsa and Nigel Willis, as well as acting judge Ashton Schippers.

The two were granted leave to appeal in February after the High Court, sitting in the Middelburg Magistrates’ Court, dismissed their application for leave to appeal in October 2017.

Advocate Wayne Gibbs and Org Basson, for the men, both conceded at the time that race was an aggravating factor in the incident.

Arguing on behalf of his client, Gibbs told the court that Mlotshwa had threatened the accused after they found him in possession of suspected stolen copper cable. He told the court that Mlotshwa had apparently told the men that they could do anything to him but not take him to the police.

But Navsa said, assuming Mlotshwa was found in possession of copper cable, as alleged, the men should have taken him to the police.

“The most normal reaction of any normal person is that they would have gone to the police,” he said.

Gibbs said the pair had wanted to “terrorise” Mlotshwa after he allegedly threatened their families and said he would burn their farms.

Jackson and Oosthuizen were sentenced to 11 years and 14 years behind bars respectively. As she handed down their sentences last year, Judge Segopotje Mphahlele said the men’s conduct was “humiliating and disgusting”.

The incident was filmed and the video went viral on social media, sparking an outcry and demands for justice. Mphahlele said their conduct had gone against the spirit of the Constitution.

The men were convicted of assault, attempted murder, kidnapping and intimidation. – Additional reporting by News24

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24


Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
President Cyril Ramaphosa has praised outgoing Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng for his outstanding leadership and service. Do you agree?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
He served well.
64% - 101 votes
He was too controversial
36% - 58 votes