Covid-19: No deal yet to access ‘90% effective’ vaccine tested in SA

play article
Subscribers can listen to this article


Dr Essak Mitha, the head of the South African arm of a key Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine clinical trial, is “full of pride” for the team’s part in research that has shown the vaccine candidate to be more than 90% effective, according to early findings released in a media statement this week.

“This is a massive development. It’s very exciting, and the interim results are very promising. It leaves me with lots of hope as this could pave the way for a vaccine to be developed before the end of the year,” says Mitha, who is a clinical trial specialist and the owner of the Newtown Clinical Research Centre in Johannesburg.

American pharmaceutical corporation Pfizer and German biotechnology company BioNTech announced this week that their vaccine candidate was successful in preventing symptomatic Covid-19 disease in the first interim analysis from the phase 3 trial that includes 44 000 people across a range of countries.

While the news has been largely well-received and global stock markets surged after the announcement, there has been some caution and criticism.

Read: If a Covid-19 vaccine is safe, effective and available, I will take it – study

There is consensus that more data is needed and some commentators have said that the companies’ announcement via press release (and not peer-reviewed publication) is neither good scientific practice nor does it help to build public trust in vaccines.

Will South Africa have access?

Pfizer and BioNTech have said they will have 500 million doses of the vaccine available by end December and 1.3 billion doses by 2021. Several countries have already entered into deals with the manufacturers for access to the vaccine.

South Africa thus far has not secured any doses of candidate vaccines from Pfizer or any other manufacturer.

The country also missed the first deadline to commit to Covax – an initiative co-lead by the World Health Organisation that aims to ensure that developing countries get access to Covid-19 vaccines.

National health department spokesperson Popo Maja confirmed that South Africa had not concluded any vaccine deal, but said negotiations with manufacturers and Covax were under way.

Reuters has reported that Botswana made an upfront payment to Covax this week, giving it the option to secure more than 940 000 doses of a Covid-19 vaccine under a two-dose regimen for 20% of its population.

Early analysis

The early analysis of the Pfizer/BioNTech results showed that individuals who received two injections of the vaccine three weeks apart experienced more than 90% fewer cases of symptomatic Covid-19 than those who received a placebo (a dummy, usually saltwater).

Researchers have consistently cautioned that a vaccine might only be 60% or 70% effective.

Pfizer and BioNTech so far analysed the data from 94 individuals who developed Covid-19 and the study will close with analysing data from 164 trial participants who develop symptoms.

The primary end of the trial is not prevention of infection with Sars-CoV-2, but rather prevention of clinically recognisable disease (i.e. Covid-19).

Many unanswered questions

Although there have not been major safety issues to date, the safety of the vaccine needs to be assessed continually, including during a phase 4 study as well as with post-marketing surveillance.

I have so much pride for our teams in South Africa, which have pulled together with this particular protocol. It has been very hectic over the past few weeks because timelines are short, but things like this make it all worthwhile,
Dr Essak Mitha

It is not yet known if the vaccine works in elderly people, those with HIV, hepatitis B and C infection, and those with comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension.

It is also not yet known if a vaccinated person who has symptoms can spread the virus to others. It is also not known whether the vaccine equally protects against mild, moderate and severe cases of Covid-19.

The South African arm of the trial includes 800 participants at four sites in Johannesburg, Pretoria, Western Cape and Limpopo.

“I have so much pride for our teams in South Africa, which have pulled together with this particular protocol. It has been very hectic over the past few weeks because timelines are short, but things like this make it all worthwhile,” Mitha says.

South Africa joined the trial at the end of September, a month after the global study had started. Mitha, who has been doing clinical trials since 2004, says he was hoping to recruit more than 800 participants.

“We completed our recruitment ahead of schedule hoping that the company would allow us more patients, but there were delays in our health department approving additional numbers, which limited us. It was sad because at the end we had queues of people lining up to take part in the study and we had to turn them away.”

According to Maja, clinical trials are a regulatory issue over which the national health department has no jurisdiction.

“It does not give permission for trial participation,” he said.

Read: Herd immunity, second wave ... forget the jargon; this is what you need to know

Trial participants were given the first dose at end of September and the second dose at the end of October. Mitha believes that some data from early participants in South Africa were included in the interim data analysis presented this week.

The selection of South Africa as one of the global hosts of the study was based on the local scientific expertise and capabilities, the epidemiology of the disease, and South Africa’s prior experience in running clinical trials.

Mitha adds that other factors to include in the trial were that “we have a diverse genetic profile and a high prevalence of HIV, people with hepatitis B and C infection, and comorbid diseases such as hypertension and diabetes”.

Cold chain concerns

A major concern is the future distribution of the possible vaccine in low-income countries. The vaccine has to be transported and stored at an extreme temperature of -80°C.

“This does pose a challenge, but there is a flicker of optimism. These types of vaccines are able to be manipulated. It’s likely that in the next few months the vaccine will be tweaked to make it more stable at different temperatures,” Mitha says.

Pfizer is working on improving the cold chain requirements to at least 2°C to 8°C, according to health news website Stat.

Professor Willem Hanekom, director of the Africa Health Research Institute, says the results are “very exciting” and “encouraging”.

“It is unlikely that the storage of the vaccine has been a priority until now because they first had to see if the vaccine works, but future development will look at making it accessible in terms of distribution.”

An mRNA vaccine

The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is based on the genetic material mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid). The mRNA vaccines have a piece of genetic material that codes for viral proteins or parts of them.

Once inside the cells, the mRNA instructs the cell’s protein factories to make copies of the viral proteins. These then stimulate the immune system to mount a protective immune response.

Hanekom says the interim results were encouraging for most other candidate vaccines that want to induce similar kinds of immunity against the spike protein.

The Pfizer trial is “a proof of concept that immunity against the spike protein may be important for protection, therefore we are optimistic that other approaches will also work”.

Our time frame is to check antibody levels at six months, 12 months and two years. This type of data will come about as the study progresses.
Professor Willem Hanekom

Hanekom and Mitha agree that what’s exciting about the mRNA vaccine platform, which has never been used before, is that it is cheaper and faster to develop a vaccine through compared with traditional vaccines.

Hanekom says safety data needed to be looked at comprehensively and this still needed to be done.

Commenting on lasting immunity, Mitha says the question on how long immunity lasts can only be determined over a period of time.

“Our time frame is to check antibody levels at six months, 12 months and two years. This type of data will come about as the study progresses.”

Mitha says while there were pockets of vaccine hesitancy, “more than 90% of the people I have engaged with would accept vaccines”.

“While there may be financial implications, and they may not receive vaccines, the will is there and they want a vaccine,” he says.

The South African arm of the trial will continue seeing patients and ensuring that all the data are captured for a final result on the study.

Read: South Africans still fear a Covid-19 vaccine, survey shows

“For me, the main issue here was offering our patients a chance to take part in the trial, and realistically we’ve offered our patients the vaccine prior to it being released globally.

“That is very exciting for me and my patients are very happy. There has also been interest from a few other companies to engage on other vaccine studies, so it looks like it’s going to be a busy 2021,” he says.

Baleta is an independent science writer, WHO vaccine safety communications advisor and Internews pandemic advisor.

Spotlight last week sent a more general list of questions to the national health department regarding its plans for Covid-19 vaccine procurement. These questions were acknowledged and a deadline extension was granted on request. We will report on these responses when we receive them.

This article was produced for Spotlight – health journalism in the public interest.


Delivering the 

news you need

+27 11 713 9001
69 Kingsway Rd, Auckland Park
We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For only R75 per month, you have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today.
Subscribe to News24


Read the digital editions of City Press here.
Read now
Voting Booth
Tourism Minister Lindiwe Sisulu’s comments on the Constitution and the judiciary has been termed an “extraordinary attack” that is “dangerous and regressive”. What are your thoughts?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
She’s within her rights
11% - 56 votes
It’s all politics
26% - 136 votes
It was irresponsible
63% - 332 votes