Judge Vally unconditionally apologises for his error

accreditation
Vally told commissioners that Econ Oil had laid a misconduct allegation against him for relying on non-existent evidence in his adverse judgment against the company that he handed down. Photo: Judges Matter / YouTube
Vally told commissioners that Econ Oil had laid a misconduct allegation against him for relying on non-existent evidence in his adverse judgment against the company that he handed down. Photo: Judges Matter / YouTube
NEWS

A high court judge is facing an investigation of misconduct by the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) for including non-existent evidence in a judgment he handed down last year in favour of Eskom in a controversial fuel oil case. He has unconditionally apologised for his error.

Judge Bashier Vally’s admission to commissioners during a recent JSC interview for a seat at the Supreme Court of Appeals (SCA) is likely to thrust Eskom’s controversial fuel oil supply contract with Econ Oil and Energy back into the spotlight.

Vally told commissioners that Econ Oil had laid a misconduct allegation against him for relying on non-existent evidence in his adverse judgment against the company that he handed down.

Vally said during the interview: 

I honestly say to you that I sit here remorseful over that error. I have tried to be as fair as possible to the person who complained, and I have said I have accepted that there was an error.

Vally was responding to a question from the Deputy Chief Justice, Mandisa Maya, relating to a City Press story last year that revealed how Vally had claimed that ex-Eskom acting legal head Bartlett Hewu had submitted a confirmatory affidavit when he had not.

His ruling cost the national power producer’s long-time fuel oil supplier Econ Oil a contract worth R8 billion to supply fuel oil to 11 Eskom power stations across the country.

Econ Oil previously supplied all of Eskom’s 16 power stations for five years from 2012 to 2017.

The now reviewed and overturned 2019 fuel oil supply contract by Vally was split between Sasol, Econ Oil and FFS Refiners.

Maya questioned Vally’s dismissive demeanour of the complaint and whether this was his general attitude.

Maya asked: 

The complaint is that you just cursorily dismissed that kind of error as a minor issue. Is this your approach to committing an error of that nature?

To which Vally responded: “This was a special motion and the papers before me were over 4 000 pages. This is one matter that taught me to be careful till working late at night all alone with all these papers (sic).”

City Press reported last year that not only did Vally include the non-existing evidence in his final judgment in favour of Eskom, but he in fact also relied on it and even went as far as commenting on it.

READ: Judge made a ‘material error’ relying on non-existent document in controversial R14bn contract case

“Perhaps now that they have petitioned the SCA for leave to appeal, perhaps the SCA will take a different view because it has been brought to their attention that there is an error in this judgment. Which error is simply, did Mr Hewu confirm? I said he did and that was wrong. It is regrettable.

“It was a very large, voluminous matter. But, I regret the error,” said Vally during his live interview on Tuesday.

“That error had no impact on the outcome. I simply mistook the view that Mr Hewu had provided a confirmatory [affidavit].

In the amount of paper around, I thought I saw it when I wrote this particular paragraph. I thought I had done it; it was wrong. I admit that it’s wrong. It’s a regrettable error, but it has not affected the outcome of the judgment. It was a regretful error and I really regret it.

Despite his apology, Vally told the Deputy Chief Justice that he still believed that mistake “was not a significant error”.

He read out a portion of the judgment which, he said, justified his minimalist view of the error: “Mr [Solly] Tshitangano [former Eskom procurement head] and Mr Hewu have both provided sworn testimonies in the form of confirmatory affidavits.

“That is the only error they have identified,” Vally said.

In its article last year, City Press revealed that not only did Vally erroneously state that Hewu had submitted a confirmatory affidavit, but he also relied on it and berated Econ Oil based on its contents.

The statement in question – which is the subject of the misconduct complaint to the JSC – is contained in paragraph five of Vally’s June 29 2021 ruling:

“Mr Tshitangano and Hewu have both provided sworn testimony – in the form of confirmatory affidavits – to this effect, which is not refuted but instead is only met with bare denial by Econ…”

Vally’s interview comes amid Chief Justice Zondo’s appointment of Justice Bess Nkabinde to head the investigation into Econ Oil’s misconduct complaint against the high court judge.

Nkabinde was appointed in August to head the inquiry that would determine the sanction against Vally should he be found guilty of misconduct.

Vally told the commissioners at the JSC interviews that he had made submissions concerning the Econ Oil misconduct complaint against him.

Econ Oil director and owner Nothemba Mlonzi said she had requested an extension to make her submissions to Nkabinde and that she would do so by Friday.

When asked whether she would pursue her court challenge against Eskom on the fuel oil contract, Mlonzi said: “My primary focus is this submission. Everything else I will look at, at the appropriate time and take legal counsel on appropriate action if any needs to be considered.”

Vally previously insisted to the JSC that Hewu did submit a confirmatory affidavit. His comments were made during a live interview in October last year for a seat on the Constitutional Court.

The Gauteng High Court judge did not make the cut for the seat on the SCA bench.

Instead, the JSC recommended judges Glenn Goosen, Daisy Molefe, Pieter Meyer, Sharise Weiner and Keaogile Matojane.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
2022 Fifa Qatar World Cup
DAYS
HRS
MINS
MORE WORLD CUP NEWS
Latest issue
Latest issue
All the news from City Press in PDF form.
Read now
Voting Booth
As the country marked Fraud Awareness Week from November 13 to 19 ahead of Black Friday, the Southern African Fraud Prevention Service has warned people about the risk of fraud on social media. What measures have you taken against fraud if you'll shop online?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Nothing, I will shop in-store
54% - 51 votes
I have done my homework and will shop on trusted sites
36% - 34 votes
Not much. I'll get the best deals online and hope for the best
11% - 10 votes
Vote