No evidence Ramaphosa contravened Ethics Code in leaked audio recording - Gcaleka

accreditation
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Photo: Kopano Tlape
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Photo: Kopano Tlape

NEWS


President Cyril Ramaphosa can breathe a sigh of relief after Acting Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka found no wrongdoing by him regarding his comments on the misuse of funds within the ANC, which surfaced in a leaked audio recording last year.

In her final investigation report, which she released on Friday, Gcaleka said that there was no evidence that Ramaphosa “contravened any provisions of the Ethics Code,” adding that allegations against the president were unsubstantiated.

Allegations against Ramaphosa were that he violated the code by failing to inform and provide evidence to all relevant investigation authorities regarding the alleged misuse of state funds for the political party's activities.

The Acting Public Protector explained:

Evidence obtained indicates that before the president made these utterances, it was widely reported even in the Zondo commission, which was public on the misuse of public funds by the ruling party for political gain.

This after Ramaphosa, in an audio, which was widely circulated on social media and sparked public debate, spoke of his knowledge of allegedly looted state money that was used for the party’s political campaigns in 2017, as well as his decision to remain silent to protect the party’s image.

The remarks were captured in a recording of an ANC national executive committee (NEC) meeting that was leaked in December last year.

In the audio, Ramaphosa can be heard saying they know that in some cases, state money has been used in some campaigns and they will not talk about it.

READ: Opinion | Damaging audio leaks from ANC meetings show how Ramaphosa being undermined

Ramaphosa further says: “I am prepared to fall on the sword so that the CR17 campaign, yes, should be the only one that is looked at.”

During a meeting of the ANC’s NEC, he said:

Each one of us knows that quite a bit of money that is used in campaigns, in bussing people around and doing all manner of things is from state and public resources. We cannot kid ourselves when it comes to that. I would rather they say, ‘yes, you got money from this businessman for CR17 than for the public to finally hear that their money was used to advance certain campaigns’.

Early this year, suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane subsequently launched an investigation into Ramaphosa for allegedly breaching the Executive Code of Ethics.

However, on Friday, Gcaleka said Ramaphosa had not.

“In the circumstances, the Public Protector of South Africa is satisfied that the utterances of the president in the audio were not in violation of the code. Accordingly, the investigation is closed,” she said.

Scopa's intervention

The investigation into Ramaphosa was launched after ANC MP Mervyn Dirks wrote to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) requesting the committee to summon Ramaphosa to account for his remarks made in the leaked audio recording.

READ: ‘Suspension of ANC MP will not stop Scopa probe into Ramaphosa’s remarks’

In January this year, the ANC subsequently suspended Dirks for trying to initiate a probe into Ramaphosa’s knowledge of looted state money that was used for the party’s political campaigns in 2017.

This after on January 26, Scopa chairperson Mkhuleko Hlengwa called a special sitting to allow Dirks to present and motivate his request. After the committee deliberated on the matter, the committee resolved to instruct Ramaphosa to explain his utterances.

However, in June, the committee decided not to investigate Ramaphosa regarding the audio.

This after members of the governing party and a majority of Scopa members prevented the committee from summoning Ramaphosa to give oral evidence on his remarks following a majority vote in March.

On allegations that her office was protecting the president, Gcaleka said:

He [Dirks] is alleging that the Public Protector is shielding the president from scrutiny. This allegation is unfounded. He says the president’s leaked remarks arose as he was being asked about the funders of the CR17 campaign.

“It is crucial for us to emphasise that Mr Dirks’ complaint, as you will see in the report, was never about the CR17 campaign and in any event, we could not reinvestigate.”


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
In times of uncertainty you need journalism you can trust. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. Journalism strengthens democracy. Invest in the future today. Thereafter you will be billed R75 per month. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won't be billed. 
Subscribe to News24
2022 Fifa Qatar World Cup
DAYS
HRS
MINS
MORE WORLD CUP NEWS
Latest issue
Latest issue
All the news from City Press in PDF form.
Read now
Voting Booth
As the country marked Fraud Awareness Week from November 13 to 19 ahead of Black Friday, the Southern African Fraud Prevention Service has warned people about the risk of fraud on social media. What measures have you taken against fraud if you'll shop online?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Nothing, I will shop in-store
52% - 94 votes
I have done my homework and will shop on trusted sites
39% - 71 votes
Not much. I'll get the best deals online and hope for the best
9% - 17 votes
Vote